Fredrickson Michael J, Paine Clinton, Hamill James
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Nov;20(11):1022-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03432.x.
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has shown promise for analgesia after pediatric inguinal surgery. This prospective, randomized study tested the hypothesis that the TAP block would provide comparable analgesia after pediatric inguinal surgery compared with a conventional ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal block.
After induction of general anesthesia, infants and children presenting for elective inguinal surgery were randomly assigned to receive an ultrasound-guided TAP block (needle cephalad of the iliac crest at the anterior axillary line) (n = 20) or ilioinguinal block (needle immediately anteromedial to the anterior superior iliac spine) (n = 21). Supplemental analgesia consisted of as-required intraoperative fentanyl, regular acetaminophen, as-required ibuprofen, and rescue morphine. Patients were assessed in the recovery room, the day-stay unit (30 min to 2 h after surgery) and at 24 h for age appropriate numerical pain score, analgesic consumption, and parental satisfaction.
In the day-stay unit, pain was more frequent (76% vs 45%, P = 0.040), and ibuprofen use was higher (62% vs 30%, P = 0.037) in the TAP group. Recovery room pain, morphine consumption and postdischarge ibuprofen use, comfort and satisfaction scores were similar between groups. Ultrasound image quality was poorer, and needle time under the skin was longer (median [interquartile range] 81 [66-120] vs 46 [40-51], P < 0.001) for the ilioinguinal group.
Following pediatric inguinal surgery, ilioinguinal block provides more effective analgesia than the TAP block.
超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在小儿腹股沟手术后镇痛方面显示出前景。这项前瞻性随机研究检验了以下假设:与传统超声引导下髂腹股沟阻滞相比,TAP阻滞在小儿腹股沟手术后能提供相当的镇痛效果。
全身麻醉诱导后,择期行腹股沟手术的婴幼儿和儿童被随机分配接受超声引导下TAP阻滞(在腋前线髂嵴头侧进针)(n = 20)或髂腹股沟阻滞(在髂前上棘正内侧进针)(n = 21)。补充镇痛包括术中按需使用芬太尼、常规对乙酰氨基酚、按需使用布洛芬以及急救吗啡。在恢复室、日间病房(术后30分钟至2小时)和术后24小时对患者进行评估,记录适合其年龄的数字疼痛评分、镇痛药物消耗量和家长满意度。
在日间病房,TAP阻滞组疼痛更频繁(76% 对45%,P = 0.040),布洛芬使用量更高(62% 对30%,P = 0.037)。两组间恢复室疼痛、吗啡消耗量、出院后布洛芬使用量、舒适度和满意度评分相似。髂腹股沟阻滞组的超声图像质量较差,皮下进针时间更长(中位数[四分位间距]81[66 - 120]对46[40 - 51],P < 0.001)。
小儿腹股沟手术后,髂腹股沟阻滞比TAP阻滞提供更有效的镇痛。