Suppr超能文献

智利野生狐狸(灰狐和 Culpeo 狐)化学固定方法的比较。

Comparison of chemical immobilization methods in wild foxes (Pseudalopex griseus and Pseudalopex culpaeus) in Chile.

作者信息

Acosta-Jamett Gerardo, Astorga-Arancibia Francisca, Cunningham Andrew A

机构信息

Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

出版信息

J Wildl Dis. 2010 Oct;46(4):1204-13. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-46.4.1204.

Abstract

We immobilized individuals of two species of free-ranging South American foxes, including 28 chilla foxes (Pseudalopex griseus; 13 males and 15 females) and five culpeo foxes (Pseudalopex culpaeus; four males and one female). Animals were trapped and chemically immobilized with ketamine and medetominide (K-M), ketamine and xylazine (K-X), or tiletamine-zolazepam (Z). Heart and respiratory rates, hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2), rectal temperature, and palpebral and anal reflexes were measured at 5-min intervals. Data were analyzed to compare the effect of anesthetic combinations on induction and recovery times, body reflexes, and physiological variables over time. In both species, K-M gave the shortest induction time, followed by K-X and Z. Palpebral and anal reflexes in chilla foxes immobilized with K-M were maintained in more animals than those treated with either K-X or Z. Animals immobilized with Z had higher heart and respiratory rates than those immobilized with either of the other two combinations. Rectal temperature decreased over time for all combinations. Foxes immobilized with K-M maintained a higher SpO2 than those immobilized with either K-X or with Z. All anesthetic combinations were satisfactory in inducing rapid and safe immobilization of the species studied. The anesthetic plane and the effects on physiologic parameters were better in animals immobilized with K-M than with either K-X or Z, and we recommend this anesthetic combination for use in Chilean foxes. Nevertheless, all three drug combinations used were satisfactory in inducing rapid and relatively smooth anesthesia.

摘要

我们固定了两种南美野生狐狸个体,包括28只灰狐(Pseudalopex griseus;13只雄性和15只雌性)和5只鬃狼狐(Pseudalopex culpaeus;4只雄性和1只雌性)。动物被诱捕并用氯胺酮和右美托咪定(K-M)、氯胺酮和赛拉嗪(K-X)或替来他明-唑拉西泮(Z)进行化学固定。每隔5分钟测量心率、呼吸频率、血红蛋白氧饱和度(SpO2)、直肠温度以及眼睑和肛门反射。对数据进行分析,以比较麻醉组合对诱导和恢复时间、身体反射以及随时间变化的生理变量的影响。在这两个物种中,K-M的诱导时间最短,其次是K-X和Z。用K-M固定的灰狐中,保持眼睑和肛门反射的动物比用K-X或Z处理的更多。用Z固定的动物的心率和呼吸频率高于用其他两种组合固定的动物。所有组合的直肠温度均随时间下降。用K-M固定的狐狸的SpO2高于用K-X或Z固定的狐狸。所有麻醉组合在诱导所研究物种快速安全固定方面均令人满意。用K-M固定的动物的麻醉平面和对生理参数的影响优于用K-X或Z固定的动物,我们建议将这种麻醉组合用于智利狐狸。然而,所使用的三种药物组合在诱导快速且相对平稳的麻醉方面均令人满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验