• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节主观评估表中文版的翻译与验证。

Translation and validation of Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.

机构信息

Department of rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13-14):1186-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.524274. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

DOI:10.3109/09638288.2010.524274
PMID:20969433
Abstract

PURPOSE

To translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF-C) to Chinese.

METHOD

Forward and backward translations were conducted by two bilingual professional translators. Content validity was verified by a panel of a senior orthopaedic surgeon and six physiotherapists. The IKDC-SKF-C was tested on 84 patients. Psychometric testing included internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest reliability. Convergent validity used Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) tests by comparing its score with the Chinese version of SF-36.

RESULTS

The Internal consistency was excellent with Cronbach's α = 0.97. Test-retest reliability was supported with an ICC = 0.87. The IKDC-SKF-C was moderately related to concurrent measures of physical function and bodily pain (r = 0.64, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The translated Chinese IKDC-SKF is a reliable and valid tool with equal measurement properties and conceptual equivalent to the original version.

摘要

目的

将国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评分表(IKDC-SKF-C)翻译并跨文化适应为中文。

方法

由两名双语专业翻译进行前后翻译。内容效度由一名资深骨科医生和六名物理治疗师组成的专家组进行验证。84 名患者接受了 IKDC-SKF-C 的测试。心理测量学测试包括内部一致性(Cronbach's α)和重测信度。通过比较其与中文版 SF-36 的得分,采用 Spearman 相关系数(rho)检验来评估其与其他指标的相关性。

结果

Cronbach's α 为 0.97,内部一致性极好。ICC 为 0.87,重测信度可靠。IKDC-SKF-C 与身体功能和躯体疼痛的同期指标中度相关(r = 0.64,p < 0.05)。

结论

翻译后的中文 IKDC-SKF 是一种可靠且有效的工具,其测量属性与原始版本相同,具有概念等效性。

相似文献

1
Translation and validation of Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节主观评估表中文版的翻译与验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13-14):1186-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.524274. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
2
Translation and validation of the Simplified Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表中文版的翻译与验证
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1433-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2973-2. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
3
Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.牛津膝关节评分中文版在膝骨关节炎患者中的验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2992-3004. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5495-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
4
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish.将国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表翻译成土耳其语并进行跨文化调适。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;44(11):899-909. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4865. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Arabic version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC): Translation and validation.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表(IKDC)阿拉伯语版:翻译与验证。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(3):659-665. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210136.
6
Comparing the Chinese versions of two knee-specific questionnaires (IKDC and KOOS): reliability, validity, and responsiveness.比较两种膝关节专用问卷(IKDC 和 KOOS)的中文版:信度、效度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 6;15(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0814-6.
7
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Chinese adaptation and validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)的中文版改编及验证
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1449-54. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3539-7. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
9
The simplified Chinese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis for mainland China: the study of reliability and validity.中国内地膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)简体中文版:信度和效度研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 27;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00619-2.
10
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS).膝关节损伤与骨关节炎转归评分-身体功能简表(KOOS-PS)土耳其语版本的信度和效度
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):461-6. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130406.

引用本文的文献

1
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Latent Growth Model Analysis: Assessing Recovery Trajectories.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表潜在生长模型分析:评估恢复轨迹
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(10):1021. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101021.
2
The Significance of Selecting an Appropriate Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Specific Paediatric International Documentation Committee Subjective (Pedi-IKDC) Knee Form.选择合适的患者报告结局指标(PROM)的意义:特定儿科国际文献委员会主观(Pedi-IKDC)膝关节表格的跨文化适应性研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;10(12):1930. doi: 10.3390/children10121930.
3
Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in a Heterogeneous Sample of Post-Operative Patients.
在术后患者的异质性样本中评估国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表的心理测量学特性。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Aug 1;18(4):923-939. doi: 10.26603/001c.83940. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessments of early patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis features after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-sectional study.前交叉韧带重建后早期髌股关节骨关节炎特征的评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 22;24(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06639-9.
5
The safety, efficacy, and functional outcomes on arthroscopic fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture by a bio-absorbable anchor or traditional pull-out technique: A prospective cohort study.生物可吸收锚钉与传统拉出技术关节镜下固定后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的安全性、有效性及功能结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 16;10:1055176. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1055176. eCollection 2022.
6
The efficacy and medium-term outcomes of ligament advanced reinforcement system compared with auto-grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: At least 2 years follow-up.前交叉韧带重建中韧带先进增强系统与自体移植物相比的疗效及中期结果:至少2年随访
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 2;10:960075. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.960075. eCollection 2022.
7
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form and the tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK) into Hebrew.国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节表和恐惧运动量表(TSK)的希伯来语翻译、跨文化适应性和信度。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2629-2640. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04548-5. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
8
Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Knee Arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后 Lysholm 评分和 Tegner 活动量表中文版的信度和效度。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jul 15;54:jrm00317. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2304.
9
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form.IKDC 膝关节主观量表印尼语版的翻译、跨文化调适、效度和信度
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 29;9(9):23259671211038372. doi: 10.1177/23259671211038372. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Arthroscopic fixation of ACL avulsion fracture in the Saint Paul Hospital: a review of treatment outcomes.圣保罗医院关节镜下前交叉韧带撕脱骨折固定术:治疗结果回顾
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Oct;29(7):1485-1491. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02466-8. Epub 2019 Jun 24.