Suppr超能文献

局部抗生素治疗:现状与未来展望。

Topical antibiotic therapy: current status and future prospects.

作者信息

Eady E A, Cove J H

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1990;16(8):423-33.

PMID:2097147
Abstract

As we enter a new decade, topical antibiotics are the subject of much renewed interest and are being used on a wider scale than ever before. The reasons for using topical rather than oral therapy for a variety of dermatoses include the reduced risk of systemic side effects, the avoidance of resistance selection in the gut microflora, the higher achievable concentration of antibiotic at the site of action and the overall usage of less drug. Somewhat surprisingly, treatment costs are not reduced by the use of topical therapy. The number of antibiotics licensed for topical use has increased in recent years and now includes representatives of the tetracycline, macrolide, lincosamide, aminoglycoside and peptide families of antibiotics in addition to fusidic acid, chloramphenicol and pseudomonic acid. Opinions regarding the clinical efficacy of topical antibiotics are conflicting, and for most indications alternative oral therapies are available. Topical antibiotics are the drugs of choice for the elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and for the therapy of eye and external ear infections. They are also effective in the treatment of impetigo and other superficial pyodermas and in the management of localised infected eczema. Topical preparations of erythromycin, clindamycin and tetracycline are widely prescribed for the therapy of acne and are of clinical benefit in mild--moderate cases. However, they are no more effective against inflamed lesions than benzoyl peroxide and are less effective against non-inflamed lesions. They are not as effective as oral tetracycline in moderate to severe acne and should not be considered as a therapy for severe acne, for which 13-cis-retinoic acid is the drug of choice. It is well known that many antibiotics, when used topically, especially for prolonged periods, select for antibiotic-resistant staphylococci at the skin surface. Tetracyclines, erythromycin and clindamycin also select for resistant staphylococci on the surface of intact skin when delivered by the oral route. The contribution of topical antibiotic usage to the current high level of antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci, which are increasingly implicated in infections of compromised hosts, has not been quantified, although it is known that cutaneous staphylococci possess a large pool of transferable resistance genes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

随着我们进入新的十年,局部用抗生素再次成为人们广泛关注的主题,并且其使用范围比以往任何时候都更广。对于各种皮肤病采用局部用药而非口服治疗的原因包括:全身副作用风险降低、避免肠道微生物群中耐药性的产生、在作用部位可达到更高的抗生素浓度以及总体用药量较少。有点令人惊讶的是,使用局部治疗并不会降低治疗成本。近年来,获批用于局部的抗生素数量有所增加,目前除了夫西地酸、氯霉素和假单胞菌酸外,还包括四环素、大环内酯、林可酰胺、氨基糖苷和肽类抗生素家族的代表药物。关于局部用抗生素临床疗效的观点存在冲突,并且对于大多数适应症都有替代的口服疗法。局部用抗生素是消除鼻腔金黄色葡萄球菌定植以及治疗眼部和外耳感染的首选药物。它们在治疗脓疱病和其他浅表脓疱病以及处理局限性感染性湿疹方面也有效。红霉素、克林霉素和四环素的局部制剂被广泛用于治疗痤疮,在轻度至中度病例中具有临床益处。然而,它们对炎症性皮损的疗效并不比过氧化苯甲酰更好,对非炎症性皮损的疗效则较差。在中度至重度痤疮中,它们不如口服四环素有效,不应被视为重度痤疮的治疗方法,重度痤疮的首选药物是异维甲酸。众所周知,许多抗生素局部使用时,尤其是长期使用,会在皮肤表面选择出耐抗生素的葡萄球菌。四环素、红霉素和克林霉素口服给药时也会在完整皮肤表面选择出耐药葡萄球菌。尽管已知皮肤葡萄球菌拥有大量可转移的耐药基因,但局部使用抗生素对目前凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中高水平抗生素耐药性的影响尚未量化,而凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌越来越多地与免疫功能低下宿主的感染有关。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验