Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2010 Dec;13(12):1525-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01543.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
Introduced species escape many pathogens and other enemies, raising three questions. How quickly do introduced hosts accumulate pathogen species? What factors control pathogen species richness? Are these factors the same in the hosts' native and introduced ranges? We analysed fungal and viral pathogen species richness on 124 plant species in both their native European range and introduced North American range. Hosts introduced 400 years ago supported six times more pathogens than those introduced 40 years ago. In hosts' native range, pathogen richness was greater on hosts occurring in more habitat types, with a history of agricultural use and adapted to greater resource supplies. In hosts' introduced range, pathogen richness was correlated with host geographic range size, agricultural use and time since introduction, but not any measured biological traits. Introduced species have accumulated pathogens at rates that are slow relative to most ecological processes, and contingent on geographic and historic circumstance.
引入物种逃避了许多病原体和其他天敌,这引发了三个问题。引入的宿主是如何快速积累病原体的?哪些因素控制着病原体的丰富度?这些因素在宿主的本地和引入地范围相同吗?我们分析了 124 种植物在其欧洲本地范围和北美引入范围的真菌和病毒病原体的丰富度。400 年前引入的宿主所携带的病原体比 40 年前引入的宿主多 6 倍。在宿主的本地范围内,生存在更多生境类型、有农业利用历史且适应更大资源供应的宿主,其病原体丰富度更高。在宿主的引入范围内,病原体丰富度与宿主的地理范围大小、农业利用以及引入后的时间有关,但与任何测量的生物特征无关。与大多数生态过程相比,引入物种积累病原体的速度较慢,而且取决于地理和历史环境。