Suppr超能文献

儿科围手术期问卷:德国八家医院的开发和数据。

Paediatric Perianesthesia questionnaire: development and data from eight hospitals across Germany.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):88-95. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq297. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opinions about satisfaction with care are rarely obtained from children and few studies of this type exist in the area of paediatric anaesthesia. In this study, we developed a comprehensive self-administered questionnaire to measure the level of paediatric and, as a substitute in younger children, parental satisfaction with anaesthesia. In addition, we aimed to identify factors influencing satisfaction and compare results between hospitals.

METHODS

We followed a rigorous protocol including construction of a pilot questionnaire and qualitative and quantitative analysis. The questionnaire was adapted for confounding variables. We analysed satisfied and dissatisfied groups and compared satisfaction scores between participating hospitals.

RESULTS

A questionnaire was developed which comprised 37 questions assessed on a five-point Likert scale. With a response rate of 71%, a total of 1052 patients completed the questionnaire. In the final analysis, 760 questionnaires (72%) were included. Most questionnaires were answered by the parents [705 (92.8%)]. The mean age of children was 6.7 (4.97) yr. Multivariate analysis found a history of previous anaesthetic problems and the identity of the person answering the questionnaire as influencing factors on the sum score. The most important differences between satisfied and dissatisfied children were found for the dimensions 'privacy and waiting', 'information giving', and 'discomfort'. Scores differed between hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our psychometric questionnaire provides a novel approach to paediatric patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care and covers areas deemed important by children, parents, and carers. Significant differences between satisfied and dissatisfied groups and between participating hospitals were found.

摘要

背景

关于护理满意度的意见很少从儿童那里获得,在小儿麻醉领域也很少有此类研究。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种综合的自我管理问卷,以衡量小儿麻醉的满意度水平,并且在年幼的儿童中,父母作为替代者对麻醉的满意度。此外,我们旨在确定影响满意度的因素,并比较医院之间的结果。

方法

我们遵循严格的方案,包括构建试点问卷以及定性和定量分析。问卷针对混杂变量进行了调整。我们分析了满意组和不满意组,并比较了参与医院的满意度评分。

结果

开发了一种问卷,其中包含 37 个问题,采用五点李克特量表进行评估。回复率为 71%,共有 1052 名患者完成了问卷。最终分析中,共纳入 760 份问卷(72%)。大多数问卷由家长回答[705 份(92.8%)]。儿童的平均年龄为 6.7(4.97)岁。多变量分析发现,以前有麻醉问题的病史和回答问卷的人的身份是影响总分的因素。在“隐私和等待”、“信息提供”和“不适”方面,满意和不满意儿童之间最重要的差异。各医院之间的评分存在差异。

结论

我们的心理测量问卷为小儿麻醉护理满意度提供了一种新方法,涵盖了儿童、家长和护理人员认为重要的领域。在满意组和不满意组以及参与医院之间发现了显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验