Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
J Rural Health. 2010 Fall;26(4):392-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00310.x.
To examine the impact of an experimental consumer-choice voucher benefit on the selection of independent and agency personal assistance services (PAS) providers among rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities.
The Medicare Primary and Consumer-Directed Care Demonstration enrolled 1,605 Medicare beneficiaries in 19 counties in New York State, West Virginia, and Ohio. A total of 839 participants were randomly assigned to receive a voucher benefit (up to $250 per month with a 20% copayment) that could be used toward PAS provided by either independent or agency workers. A bivariate probit model was used to estimate the probabilities of choosing either type of PAS provider while controlling for potential confounders.
The voucher was associated with a 32.4% (P < .01) increase in the probability of choosing agency providers and a 12.5% (P= .03) increase in the likelihood of choosing independent workers. When the analysis was stratified by rural/urban status, rural voucher recipients had 36.8% higher probability of using independent workers compared to rural controls. Urban voucher recipients had 37.1% higher probability of using agency providers compared to urban controls.
This study provided evidence that rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities may have very different responses to a consumer-choice PAS voucher program. Offering a consumer-choice voucher option to rural populations holds the potential to significantly improve their access to PAS.
考察一项实验性消费者选择代金券福利对农村和城市医疗保险残疾受益人的独立和代理个人援助服务(PAS)提供者选择的影响。
医疗保险主要和消费者导向护理试点项目在纽约州、西弗吉尼亚州和俄亥俄州的 19 个县招募了 1605 名医疗保险受益人。共有 839 名参与者被随机分配接受代金券福利(每月最多 250 美元,自付 20%),可用于独立或机构工作人员提供的 PAS。使用二元 Probit 模型来估计在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下选择任何一种 PAS 提供者的概率。
代金券与选择代理服务提供者的概率增加 32.4%(P<.01),与选择独立工人的可能性增加 12.5%(P=.03)相关。当按农村/城市地位进行分层分析时,农村代金券接受者使用独立工人的可能性比农村对照者高 36.8%。城市代金券接受者使用代理服务提供者的可能性比城市对照者高 37.1%。
本研究提供的证据表明,农村和城市医疗保险残疾受益人可能对消费者选择 PAS 代金券计划有非常不同的反应。为农村人口提供消费者选择代金券选项有可能大大改善他们获得 PAS 的机会。