Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21211, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Mar;119(3):279-83. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002625. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
Industrial food animal production employs many of the same antibiotics or classes of antibiotics that are used in human medicine. These drugs can be administered to food animals in the form of free-choice medicated feeds (FCMF), where animals choose how much feed to consume. Routine administration of these drugs to livestock selects for microorganisms that are resistant to medications critical to the treatment of clinical infections in humans.
In this commentary, we discuss the history of medicated feeds, the nature of FCMF use with regard to dose delivery, and U.S. policies that address antimicrobial drug use in food animals.
FCMF makes delivering a predictable, accurate, and intended dose difficult. Overdosing can lead to animal toxicity; underdosing or inconsistent dosing can result in a failure to resolve animal diseases and in the development of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.
The delivery of antibiotics to food animals for reasons other than the treatment of clinically diagnosed disease, especially via free-choice feeding methods, should be reconsidered.
工业食品动物生产采用了许多与人类医学中使用的相同的抗生素或抗生素类别。这些药物可以以自由选择的药物饲料(FCMF)的形式施用于食用动物,动物可以选择食用多少饲料。对牲畜进行这些药物的常规给药会选择对抗生素具有耐药性的微生物,而这些抗生素对人类临床感染的治疗至关重要。
在这篇评论中,我们讨论了药物饲料的历史,FCMF 给药方面的剂量输送的性质,以及美国针对食品动物中抗生素使用的政策。
FCMF 使提供可预测、准确和预期的剂量变得困难。过量用药会导致动物毒性;用药不足或剂量不一致可能导致动物疾病无法解决,并导致抗微生物药物耐药微生物的产生。
应该重新考虑出于治疗临床诊断疾病以外的原因,特别是通过自由选择喂养方法,将抗生素施用于食用动物的做法。