Suppr超能文献

基于 CT 的软件工具,用于评估被动散射质子治疗中的补偿器质量。

A CT-based software tool for evaluating compensator quality in passively scattered proton therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21;55(22):6759-71. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/010. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

Abstract

We have developed a quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based quality assurance (QA) tool for evaluating the accuracy of manufactured compensators used in passively scattered proton therapy. The thickness of a manufactured compensator was measured from its CT images and compared with the planned thickness defined by the treatment planning system. The difference between the measured and planned thicknesses was calculated with use of the Euclidean distance transformation and the kd-tree search method. Compensator accuracy was evaluated by examining several parameters including mean distance, maximum distance, global thickness error and central axis shifts. Two rectangular phantoms were used to validate the performance of the QA tool. Nine patients and 20 compensators were included in this study. We found that mean distances, global thickness errors and central axis shifts were all within 1 mm for all compensators studied, with maximum distances ranging from 1.1 to 3.8 mm. Although all compensators passed manual verification at selected points, about 5% of the pixels still had maximum distances of >2 mm, most of which correlated with large depth gradients. The correlation between the mean depth gradient of the compensator and the percentage of pixels with mean distance <1 mm is -0.93 with p < 0.001, which suggests that the mean depth gradient is a good indicator of compensator complexity. These results demonstrate that the CT-based compensator QA tool can be used to quantitatively evaluate manufactured compensators.

摘要

我们开发了一种基于定量计算机断层扫描(CT)的质量保证(QA)工具,用于评估被动散射质子治疗中使用的制造补偿器的准确性。从 CT 图像测量制造补偿器的厚度,并将其与治疗计划系统定义的计划厚度进行比较。使用欧几里得距离变换和 kd 树搜索方法计算测量厚度与计划厚度之间的差异。通过检查几个参数,包括平均距离、最大距离、全局厚度误差和中心轴偏移,评估补偿器的准确性。使用两个矩形体模验证 QA 工具的性能。本研究包括 9 名患者和 20 个补偿器。我们发现,所有研究的补偿器的平均距离、全局厚度误差和中心轴偏移均在 1mm 以内,最大距离范围为 1.1 至 3.8mm。尽管所有补偿器都在选定的点通过了手动验证,但仍有约 5%的像素的最大距离大于 2mm,其中大多数与较大的深度梯度相关。补偿器的平均深度梯度与平均距离<1mm 的像素百分比之间的相关性为-0.93,p<0.001,这表明平均深度梯度是补偿器复杂性的良好指标。这些结果表明,基于 CT 的补偿器 QA 工具可用于定量评估制造补偿器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验