• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者导航员项目对结肠镜检查数量和质量的影响。

Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 May-Jun;45(5):e47-53. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181f595c3.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181f595c3
PMID:21030874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3032043/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

To increase colorectal cancer screening among urban minorities, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University, with support from the New York City Department of Health and the Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition (C5), instituted a patient navigation and direct endoscopic referral system. We assessed the effect of this program on the volume of colonoscopy in this institution, which caters to a socioeconomically diverse patient population.

STUDY

We compared colonoscopy volume during the first year of the navigator program with the volume during the year before this program. We stratified on Medicaid status to assess the secular trend of screening rates. To assess quality during this period, we measured cecal intubation rates, preparation quality, and adenoma detection rates.

RESULTS

Of the 749 patients assessed by the patient navigators, 678 (91%) underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy volume among the Medicaid outpatients increased by 56% (957 to 1489). Adenoma detection was 27% and the cecal intubation rate was 97%. Comparing navigated patients with the nonnavigated Medicaid outpatients, preparation quality was superior (34% vs. 40% suboptimal, P=0.0282), although preparation quality remained inferior to that of private patients (20% suboptimal, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Volume of the colonoscopy increased, coinciding with the onset of the patient navigation program. This increase was nearly entirely owing to a rise in the colonoscopies among Medicaid outpatients, the principal focus of the navigator program. This increase in quantity was accomplished while maintaining an overall high level of quality as measured by cecal intubation rates and adenoma detection, although preparation quality requires further efforts at improvement.

摘要

背景与目标

为了提高城市少数民族的结直肠癌筛查率,纽约长老会医院/哥伦比亚大学在纽约市卫生局和全市结肠癌控制联盟(C5)的支持下,建立了一个患者导航和直接内镜转诊系统。我们评估了该计划对本机构结肠镜检查量的影响,本机构服务的患者人群具有社会经济多样性。

研究

我们比较了导航员计划实施的第一年与该计划实施前一年的结肠镜检查量。我们按医疗补助状况进行分层,以评估筛查率的趋势。为了评估这段时间的质量,我们测量了盲肠插管率、准备质量和腺瘤检出率。

结果

在 749 名接受患者导航员评估的患者中,有 678 名(91%)接受了结肠镜检查。医疗补助门诊患者的结肠镜检查量增加了 56%(从 957 例增加到 1489 例)。腺瘤检出率为 27%,盲肠插管率为 97%。与未接受导航的医疗补助门诊患者相比,接受导航的患者准备质量更好(34%vs.40%准备不充分,P=0.0282),尽管准备质量仍低于私人患者(20%准备不充分,P<0.0001)。

结论

结肠镜检查量增加,与患者导航计划的开始时间相符。这一增长主要归因于医疗补助门诊患者结肠镜检查量的增加,这是导航员计划的主要重点。在保持盲肠插管率和腺瘤检出率等整体高质量的情况下,增加了结肠镜检查量,尽管准备质量仍需进一步改进。

相似文献

1
Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.患者导航员项目对结肠镜检查数量和质量的影响。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 May-Jun;45(5):e47-53. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181f595c3.
2
Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.在城市公立医院环境中评估一项增加结肠镜筛查的干预措施。
J Urban Health. 2006 Mar;83(2):231-43. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9029-6.
3
A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities.一项提高城市少数族裔人群结肠镜筛查完成率的计划。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;6(4):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Feasibility of Patient Navigation and Impact on Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy in a Large Diverse Urban Population.患者导航的可行性及其对大型多样化城市人群筛查结肠镜检查依从性的影响。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00812-9. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities.一项使用患者导航来提高低收入少数族裔结肠镜检查筛查率的随机对照试验。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Mar;100(3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31240-2.
6
Screening Colonoscopy among Uninsured and Underinsured Urban Minorities.未参保及参保不足的城市少数族裔人群的结肠镜筛查
Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):502-8. doi: 10.5009/gnl14039.
7
A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.为南卡罗来纳州的未参保人群提供结直肠癌筛查的全州性计划。
Cancer. 2018 May 1;124(9):1912-1920. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31250. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Increasing referral rate for screening colonoscopy through patient education and activation at a primary care clinic in New York City.通过纽约市一家初级保健诊所的患者教育与动员提高结肠镜筛查转诊率。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Impact of a Citywide Benchmarking Intervention on Colonoscopy Quality Performance.全市范围内基准干预对结肠镜检查质量表现的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2534-2541. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06067-y. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT.结肠镜检查完成的患者导航:一项 RCT 的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):363-372. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
"It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.“这是一种工具,会有艰难之处”:一项关于结肠镜检查患者体验及对创伤知情护理影响的定性研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251346250. doi: 10.1177/17562848251346250. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of a Tailored Patient Navigation Program for Improving Multitarget Stool DNA Test Adherence.评估定制化患者导航计划对提高多靶点粪便DNA检测依从性的效果
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):935-940. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09201-y. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Patient Navigation Plus Tailored Digital Video Disc Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Low-Income and Minority Patients Who Did Not Attend a Scheduled Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial.患者导航加定制数字视频光盘增加了低收入和少数族裔患者的结直肠癌筛查率,这些患者没有参加计划的筛查结肠镜检查:一项随机试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Apr 11;58(5):314-327. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae013.
4
Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test.随机试验:促进筛查结肠镜与基于粪便的连续血液检测的依从性比较。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jul;165(1):252-266. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.206. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Predictors of treatment refusal in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review.预测结直肠癌患者治疗拒绝的因素:系统评价。
Semin Oncol. 2022 Dec;49(6):456-464. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
6
Communities Helping the Hearing of Infants by Reaching Parents (CHHIRP) through patient navigation: a hybrid implementation effectiveness stepped wedge trial protocol.社区通过患者导航帮助听力受损婴儿(CHHIRP):一项混合实施有效性阶梯式楔形试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e054548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054548.
7
Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者导向信息传递对结直肠癌筛查的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4529.
8
Decreased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in a diverse urban population with increased colonoscopy screening.结肠镜筛查增加使不同种族城市人群结直肠癌发病率和死亡率降低。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11330-6.
9
Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up.粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的患者导航可增加诊断性结肠镜检查,并凸显出随访的多层次障碍。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Nov;66(11):3760-3768. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06866-x. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.结肠镜检查患者的经历:一项定性研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 17;3(6):249-256. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz016. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality.社会经济因素及其他因素对结肠镜检查准备质量的预测。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jul;55(7):2014-20. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1079-7. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
2
Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005.2000年至2005年医疗保险参保者中结直肠癌筛查的社会经济和种族模式。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Aug;18(8):2170-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0104. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
3
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
4
A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.社区卫生中心针对结直肠癌筛查的文化定制导航计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0864-x.
5
Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy.在结肠镜检查期间,同行参与可能会提高腺瘤检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2841-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02085.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
6
Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中的个性化导航
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S123-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf46.
7
A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities.一项使用患者导航来提高低收入少数族裔结肠镜检查筛查率的随机对照试验。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Mar;100(3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31240-2.
8
Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.2002年、2004年及2006年美国结直肠癌检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Mar 14;57(10):253-8.
9
A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities.一项提高城市少数族裔人群结肠镜筛查完成率的计划。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;6(4):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
10
Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race.美国按教育水平和种族划分的癌症死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 19;99(18):1384-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm127. Epub 2007 Sep 11.