• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为南卡罗来纳州的未参保人群提供结直肠癌筛查的全州性计划。

A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

出版信息

Cancer. 2018 May 1;124(9):1912-1920. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31250. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.31250
PMID:29415338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5910186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer screening rates are lowest in those without insurance or a regular provider. Since 2008, the Colorectal Cancer Prevention Network (CCPN) has provided open access colonoscopy to uninsured residents of South Carolina through established, statewide partnerships and patient navigation. Herein, we describe the structure, implementation, and clinical outcomes of this program.

METHODS

The CCPN provides access to colonoscopy screening at no cost to uninsured, asymptomatic patients aged 50-64 years (African Americans age 45-64 years are eligible) who live at or below 150% of the poverty line and seek medical care in free medical clinics, federally qualified health centers, or hospital-based indigent practices in South Carolina. Screening is performed by board-certified gastroenterologists. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis are used to describe the population screened, and to assess compliance rates and colonoscopy quality metrics.

RESULTS

Out of >4000 patients referred to the program, 1854 were deemed eligible, 1144 attended an in-person navigation visit, and 1030 completed a colonoscopy; 909 were included in the final sample. Nearly 90% of participants exhibited good-to-excellent bowel preparation. An overall cecal intubation rate of 99% was measured. The polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate were 63% and 36%, respectively, with male sex and urban residence positively associated with adenoma detection. Over 13% of participants had an advanced polyp, and 1% had a cancer diagnosis or surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

The CCPN program is characterized by strong collaboration with clinicians statewide, low no-show rates, and high colonoscopy quality. Future work will assess the effectiveness of the navigation approach and will explore the mechanisms driving higher adenoma detection in urban participants. Cancer 2018;124:1912-20. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

在没有保险或常规医疗服务提供者的人群中,癌症筛查率最低。自 2008 年以来,大肠癌预防网络(CCPN)通过建立全州范围的合作伙伴关系和患者导航,为南卡罗来纳州的无保险居民提供了免费的结肠镜检查。在此,我们描述了该项目的结构、实施和临床结果。

方法

CCPN 为符合条件的 50-64 岁(45-64 岁的非裔美国人符合条件)的无保险、无症状患者提供免费的结肠镜检查服务,这些患者的收入处于或低于贫困线的 150%,并在南卡罗来纳州的免费医疗诊所、合格的联邦健康中心或医院的贫困患者医疗服务中寻求医疗服务。筛查由经董事会认证的胃肠病学家进行。描述性统计和回归分析用于描述被筛查的人群,并评估合规率和结肠镜检查质量指标。

结果

在 4000 多名被推荐参加该项目的患者中,有 1854 名被认为符合条件,1144 名参加了面对面的导航访问,1030 名完成了结肠镜检查;909 名被纳入最终样本。近 90%的参与者肠道准备良好至优秀。总体盲肠插管率为 99%。息肉检出率和腺瘤检出率分别为 63%和 36%,男性和城市居住与腺瘤检出呈正相关。超过 13%的参与者有高级息肉,1%的参与者有癌症诊断或手术干预。

结论

CCPN 项目的特点是与全州的临床医生密切合作,低失约率和高结肠镜检查质量。未来的工作将评估导航方法的有效性,并探讨导致城市参与者腺瘤检出率较高的机制。癌症 2018;124:1912-20. © 2018 美国癌症协会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/5910186/a8320abb4c94/nihms932996f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/5910186/6051cee54841/nihms932996f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/5910186/a8320abb4c94/nihms932996f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/5910186/6051cee54841/nihms932996f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/5910186/a8320abb4c94/nihms932996f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.为南卡罗来纳州的未参保人群提供结直肠癌筛查的全州性计划。
Cancer. 2018 May 1;124(9):1912-1920. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31250. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Colon cancer screening for Colorado's underserved: a community clinic/academic partnership.科罗拉多州服务不足人群的结肠癌筛查:社区诊所/学术合作。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Mar;48(3):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
3
Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT.结肠镜检查完成的患者导航:一项 RCT 的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):363-372. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured.联邦无保险人群结直肠癌筛查项目中的筛查质量差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 30;16:E67. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180452.
5
Increasing colonoscopy screening in disparate populations: Results from an evaluation of patient navigation in the New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.在不同人群中增加结肠镜检查筛查:新罕布什尔州结直肠癌筛查项目中患者导航评估的结果。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3356-3366. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30761. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Optimal colorectal cancer screening in states' low-income, uninsured populations—the case of South Carolina.美国南卡罗来纳州低收入、未参保人群的最佳结直肠癌筛查情况
Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):768-89. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12246. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
[Results and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening program among urban residents in Zhejiang province, 2013-2018].[2013 - 2018年浙江省城市居民结直肠癌筛查项目的结果与成本效益]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 10;41(12):2080-2086. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200324-00424.
8
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Does Rurality Play a Role?结直肠癌筛查的预测因素:农村地区是否起作用?
J Rural Health. 2015 Summer;31(3):254-68. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12104. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
9
Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.探索医疗补助计划参与情况及结直肠癌筛查等待时间对康涅狄格州早期检测工作的影响——一项暗访调查
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):197-203.
10
Promoting colonoscopy screening among low-income Latinos at average risk of colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial.在结直肠癌平均风险的低收入拉丁裔人群中推广结肠镜筛查:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):782-791. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32541. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.肺癌护理中的公平性与机会——应对差异、挑战及未来路径
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081347.
2
Closing the Gap: Approaches to Improving Colorectal Surgery Care for the Uninsured and Underinsured.缩小差距:改善无保险和保险不足人群结直肠手术护理的方法。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 May 15;38(1):49-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786398. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与结肠镜检查准备质量相关的患者特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):357-369.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Evaluating screening colonoscopy quality in an uninsured urban population following patient navigation.在患者导航之后评估未参保城市人群的结肠镜筛查质量。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 27;5:194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.019. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Against colorectal cancer in our neighborhoods (ACCION): A comprehensive community-wide colorectal cancer screening intervention for the uninsured in a predominantly Hispanic community.
改善高收入国家医疗服务不足人群癌症护理可及性的干预措施:一项系统评价
Oncol Rev. 2024 Nov 5;18:1427441. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1427441. eCollection 2024.
4
Quality measures in the delivery of equitable endoscopic care to traditionally underserved patients in the United States.在美国为传统上服务不足的患者提供公平的内镜护理中的质量衡量标准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Apr;101(4):733-744. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.030. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
5
Reach and effectiveness of a centralized navigation program for patients with positive fecal immunochemical tests requiring follow-up colonoscopy.针对粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性且需要后续结肠镜检查的患者的集中式导航计划的覆盖范围和有效性。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 17;34:102211. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102211. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
7
Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.筛查结肠镜检查中平均风险个体的早发性结直肠肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Oct;161(4):1145-1155.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Colorectal cancer screening in the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情时代的结直肠癌筛查
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):238-251. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.238.
9
Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Among the Uninsured of Tampa Bay: A Free Clinic Study.塔帕湾未参保人群的结直肠癌风险因素与筛查:一项免费诊所研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Feb 25;18:E16. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200496.
10
Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.黑白人群在结直肠癌筛查及筛查结局方面的差异:一项叙述性综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jan;30(1):3-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1537. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
对抗我们社区中的结直肠癌(ACCION):针对一个以西班牙裔为主的社区中未参保人群的全社区范围综合性结直肠癌筛查干预措施
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
Differences in Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Race and Insurance.结直肠癌结局在种族和保险方面的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010048.
6
Simple colonoscopy reporting system checking the detection rate of colon polyps.用于检查结肠息肉检出率的简易结肠镜检查报告系统
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 21;21(31):9380-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9380.
7
Impact of care at comprehensive cancer centers on outcome: Results from a population-based study.综合癌症中心的护理对治疗结果的影响:一项基于人群研究的结果
Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;121(21):3885-93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29576. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates at Community Health Centers that Use Electronic Health Records: A Cross Sectional Study.使用电子健康记录的社区卫生中心的结直肠癌筛查率:一项横断面研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 May;26(2):377-90. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0030.
9
Sessile serrated polyps: detection, eradication, and prevention of the evil twin.无蒂锯齿状息肉:“邪恶双胞胎”的检测、根除与预防
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;13(1):156-70. doi: 10.1007/s11938-015-0046-y.
10
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.结直肠癌筛查与监测
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jan 15;91(2):93-100.