Suppr超能文献

使用 3D-MDEFT 进行基于体素的脑和颈椎脊髓区域测量的同步形态测量方法。

Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT.

机构信息

Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Nov;32(5):1242-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22340.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry also yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of brain and cervical cord of 10 controls and eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were acquired with the 3D-MDEFT-based imaging protocol and an 8-channel receive head coil. The new protocol was validated by two observers 1) comparing the SCA measured with the standard acquisition protocol (3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo [MPRAGE] and dedicated spine coil) and the new protocol; and 2) determining the scan-rescan reproducibility of the new protocol.

RESULTS

Scan-rescan reproducibility of SCA measurements with the MDEFT approach showed a similar precision for both observers with standard deviation (SD) <4.5 mm(2) and coefficient of variation (CV) ≤5.1%. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a main effect of observer and interaction between observer and scan protocol that could be primarily attributed to a small observer bias for MPRAGE (difference in SCA <2.1 mm(2)). No bias was observed for 3D-MDEFT vs. 3D-MPRAGE.

CONCLUSION

The 3D-MDEFT method allows for robust unbiased assessment of SCA in addition to brain morphology.

摘要

目的

研究基于三维修正驱动平衡傅里叶变换(MDEFT)的脑形态测量采集方案是否也能提供关于脊髓横截面积(SCA)的可靠信息。

材料与方法

10 例健康对照者和 8 例脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的脑和颈髓图像采用基于 3D-MDEFT 的成像方案和 8 通道接收线圈进行采集。新方案通过两位观察者进行了验证:1)比较标准采集方案(3D 磁化准备快速获取梯度回波[MPRAGE]和专用脊柱线圈)和新方案测量的 SCA;2)确定新方案的扫描-再扫描可重复性。

结果

MDEFT 方法测量 SCA 的扫描-再扫描可重复性对于两位观察者具有相似的精度,标准偏差(SD)<4.5mm2,变异系数(CV)≤5.1%。方差分析(ANOVA)显示观察者和扫描方案之间存在主要交互作用,这主要归因于 MPRAGE 的观察者偏倚较小(SCA 差异<2.1mm2)。与 3D-MPRAGE 相比,3D-MDEFT 没有观察到偏差。

结论

除了脑形态学外,3D-MDEFT 方法还可以对 SCA 进行稳健、无偏的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/3078516/327a9e8f7082/jmri0032-1242-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验