University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):673-9. doi: 10.3758/17.5.673.
A key motivation for understanding capacity in working memory (WM) is its relationship with fluid intelligence. Recent evidence has suggested a two-factor model that distinguishes between the number of representations that can be maintained in WM and the resolution of those representations. To determine how these factors relate to fluid intelligence, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis on multiple number-limited and resolution-limited measures of WM ability. The results strongly supported the two-factor model, with fully orthogonal factors accounting for performance in the number-limited and resolution-limited conditions. Furthermore, the reliable relationship between WM capacity and fluid intelligence was exclusively supported by the number factor (r = .66), whereas the resolution factor made no reliable contribution (r = -.05). Thus, the relationship between WM capacity and standard measures of fluid intelligence is mediated by the number of representations that can be simultaneously maintained in WM, rather than by the precision of those representations.
理解工作记忆 (WM) 容量的一个主要动机是其与流体智力的关系。最近的证据表明了一种两因素模型,该模型区分了可以在 WM 中维持的表示数量和这些表示的分辨率。为了确定这些因素与流体智力的关系,我们对多个数量有限和分辨率有限的 WM 能力测量进行了探索性因素分析。结果强烈支持了两因素模型,完全正交的因素解释了数量有限和分辨率有限条件下的表现。此外,WM 容量与流体智力之间的可靠关系仅由数量因素(r =.66)支持,而分辨率因素没有可靠的贡献(r = -.05)。因此,WM 容量与流体智力的标准测量之间的关系是由可以同时在 WM 中维持的表示数量介导的,而不是由这些表示的精度介导的。