Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pain Res Manag. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):287-94. doi: 10.1155/2010/106593.
Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) represents a significant public health problem, resulting in a substantial socioeconomic burden throughout the industrialized world, wherever costs are documented. While many treatments have been advocated for patients with WAD, scientific evidence of their effectiveness is often lacking. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the strength of evidence supporting various WAD therapies. Multiple databases (including Web of Science, EMBASE and PubMed) were searched to identify all studies published from January 1980 through March 2009 that evaluated the effectiveness of any clearly defined treatment for acute (less than two weeks), subacute (two to 12 weeks) or chronic (longer than 12 weeks) WAD. The present article, the first in a five-part series, provides an overview of the review methodology as well as a summary and discussion of the review's main findings. Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, 40 of which were randomized controlled trials. The majority of studies (n=47) evaluated treatments initiated in the chronic stage of the disorder, while 23 evaluated treatments for acute WAD and 13 assessed therapies for subacute WAD. Exercise and mobilization programs for acute and chronic WAD had the strongest supporting evidence, although many questions remain regarding the relative effectiveness of various protocols. At present, there is insufficient evidence to support any treatment for subacute WAD. For patients with chronic WAD who do not respond to conventional treatments, it appears that radiofrequency neurotomy may be the most effective treatment option. The present review found a relatively weak but growing research base on which one could make recommendations for patients at any stage of the WAD continuum. Further research is needed to determine which treatments are most effective at reducing the disabling symptoms associated with WAD.
颈挥鞭伤相关障碍(WAD)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在整个工业化世界都造成了巨大的社会经济负担,无论在何处都有成本记录。虽然已经有许多治疗方法被推荐给 WAD 患者,但这些方法的有效性往往缺乏科学证据。本系统评价旨在评估支持各种 WAD 治疗方法的证据强度。通过检索多个数据库(包括 Web of Science、EMBASE 和 PubMed),确定了所有从 1980 年 1 月到 2009 年 3 月发表的评估任何明确界定的治疗急性(不到 2 周)、亚急性(2 至 12 周)或慢性(超过 12 周)WAD 的有效性的研究。本文是五部分系列的第一篇,介绍了综述方法,并对综述的主要发现进行了总结和讨论。83 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 40 项为随机对照试验。大多数研究(n=47)评估了在疾病慢性期开始的治疗,23 项评估了急性 WAD 的治疗,13 项评估了亚急性 WAD 的治疗。急性和慢性 WAD 的运动和动员计划有最强的支持证据,尽管对于各种方案的相对有效性仍有许多问题。目前,没有足够的证据支持亚急性 WAD 的任何治疗。对于慢性 WAD 患者,如果对常规治疗没有反应,射频神经切断术似乎是最有效的治疗选择。本综述发现,在 WAD 连续体的任何阶段,为患者提供建议的基础相对薄弱,但正在增长。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些治疗方法最能有效减轻与 WAD 相关的致残症状。