Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pain Res Manag. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):313-22. doi: 10.1155/2010/487279.
Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) represents a significant public health problem, resulting in substantial social and economic costs throughout the industrialized world. While many treatments have been advocated for patients with WAD, scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness is often lacking. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the strength of evidence for various WAD therapies. Multiple databases (including Web of Science, EMBASE and PubMed) were searched to identify all studies published from January 1980 through March 2009 that evaluated the effectiveness of any clearly defined treatment for acute (less than two weeks), subacute (two to 12 weeks) or chronic (longer than 12 weeks) WAD. The present article, the fourth in a five-part series, evaluates the evidence for noninvasive interventions initiated during the chronic phase of WAD. Twenty-two studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified, 12 of which were randomized controlled trials with 'good' overall methodological quality (median Physiotherapy Evidence Database score of 6). For the treatment of chronic WAD, there is evidence to suggest that exercise programs are effective in relieving whiplash-related pain, at least over the short term. While the majority of a subset of nine studies supported the effectiveness of interdisciplinary interventions, the two randomized controlled trials provided conflicting results. Finally, there was limited evidence, consisting of one supportive case series each, that both manual joint manipulation and myofeedback training may provide some benefit. Based on the available research, exercise programs were the most effective noninvasive treatment for patients with chronic WAD, although many questions remain regarding the relative effectiveness of various exercise regimens.
颈挥鞭伤相关疾病(WAD)是一个严重的公共健康问题,在工业化世界的各个国家和地区都造成了巨大的社会和经济负担。虽然有许多治疗方法被推荐用于 WAD 患者,但支持其疗效的科学证据往往缺乏。本系统评价旨在评估各种 WAD 治疗方法的证据强度。通过检索多个数据库(包括 Web of Science、EMBASE 和 PubMed),识别出所有发表于 1980 年 1 月至 2009 年 3 月的研究,评估了明确界定的急性(<2 周)、亚急性(2-12 周)或慢性(>12 周)WAD 治疗效果的研究。本文是五部分系列文章中的第四篇,评估了慢性 WAD 期间开始的非侵入性干预措施的证据。共确定了 22 项符合纳入标准的研究,其中 12 项为总体方法质量良好的随机对照试验(物理治疗证据数据库评分中位数为 6)。对于慢性 WAD 的治疗,有证据表明运动方案在缓解挥鞭伤相关疼痛方面是有效的,至少在短期是如此。虽然大多数支持跨学科干预措施有效的 9 项研究中的亚组研究支持这一结果,但两项随机对照试验的结果相互矛盾。最后,仅有一项支持性病例系列研究提供了有限的证据,提示手动关节松动术和肌电反馈训练可能会带来一些益处。基于现有的研究,运动方案是治疗慢性 WAD 患者最有效的非侵入性治疗方法,尽管关于各种运动方案的相对有效性仍有许多问题需要解决。