Suppr超能文献

颈背部扭伤相关疾病(WAD)治疗干预的研究综合报告:第 3 部分-亚急性 WAD 的干预。

A research synthesis of therapeutic interventions for whiplash-associated disorder (WAD): part 3 - interventions for subacute WAD.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):305-12. doi: 10.1155/2010/108685.

Abstract

Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) represents a significant public health problem, resulting in substantial social and economic costs throughout the industrialized world. While many treatments have been advocated for patients with WAD, scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness is often lacking. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the strength of evidence associated with various WAD therapies. Multiple databases (including Web of Science, EMBASE and PubMed) were searched to identify all studies published from January 1980 through March 2009 that evaluated the effectiveness of any clearly defined treatment for acute (less than two weeks), subacute (two to 12 weeks) or chronic (longer than 12 weeks) WAD. The present article, the third in a five-part series, evaluates the evidence for interventions initiated during the subacute phase of WAD. Thirteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified, six of which were randomized controlled trials with 'good' overall methodology (median Physiotherapy Evidence Database score of 6). Although some evidence was identified to support the use of interdisciplinary interventions and chiropractic manipulation, the evidence was not strong for any of the evaluated treatments. There is a clear need for further research to evaluate interventions aimed at treating patients with subacute WAD because there are currently no interventions satisfactorily supported by the research literature.

摘要

颈挥鞭伤相关障碍(WAD)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在整个工业化世界造成了巨大的社会和经济负担。尽管有许多治疗方法被推荐用于 WAD 患者,但支持其有效性的科学证据往往缺乏。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以评估与各种 WAD 治疗相关的证据强度。通过检索多个数据库(包括 Web of Science、EMBASE 和 PubMed),确定了所有发表于 1980 年 1 月至 2009 年 3 月的研究,这些研究评估了任何明确定义的治疗急性(少于两周)、亚急性(两至十二周)或慢性(十二周以上) WAD 的有效性。本文是五部分系列的第三部分,评估了 WAD 亚急性期开始的干预措施的证据。确定了符合纳入标准的 13 项研究,其中 6 项是总体方法学较好的随机对照试验(物理治疗证据数据库评分中位数为 6)。虽然有一些证据支持采用多学科干预和脊椎按摩疗法,但评估的治疗方法中没有一种有很强的证据支持。由于目前没有任何干预措施得到研究文献的充分支持,因此迫切需要进一步研究评估针对亚急性 WAD 患者的干预措施。

相似文献

6
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.机械性颈部疾病的锻炼方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub3.
10
Conservative treatments for whiplash.挥鞭样损伤的保守治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003338.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验