Department of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3913-22. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0017.
Accurate reconstruction of prehistoric social organization is important if we are to put together satisfactory multidisciplinary scenarios about, for example, the dispersal of human groups. Such considerations apply in the case of Indo-European and Austronesian, two large-scale language families that are thought to represent Neolithic expansions. Ancestral kinship patterns have mostly been inferred through reconstruction of kin terminologies in ancestral proto-languages using the linguistic comparative method, and through geographical or distributional arguments based on the comparative patterns of kin terms and ethnographic kinship 'facts'. While these approaches are detailed and valuable, the processes through which conclusions have been drawn from the data fail to provide explicit criteria for systematic testing of alternative hypotheses. Here, we use language trees derived using phylogenetic tree-building techniques on Indo-European and Austronesian vocabulary data. With these trees, ethnographic data and Bayesian phylogenetic comparative methods, we statistically reconstruct past marital residence and infer rates of cultural change between different residence forms, showing Proto-Indo-European to be virilocal and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian uxorilocal. The instability of uxorilocality and the rare loss of virilocality once gained emerge as common features of both families.
如果我们要综合出有关人类群体扩散等问题的令人满意的多学科场景,准确重建史前社会组织结构就显得非常重要。在印欧语系和南岛语系这两个被认为代表新石器时代扩张的大语系的案例中,情况就是如此。亲属关系模式主要是通过使用语言比较方法重建原始母语中的亲属术语,并通过基于亲属术语和民族志亲属“事实”的比较模式的地理或分布论点来推断。虽然这些方法很详细且很有价值,但从数据中得出结论的过程并未为系统测试替代假设提供明确的标准。在这里,我们使用基于语料库的词汇数据构建的进化树构建技术来构建印欧语系和南岛语系的语言树。利用这些树、民族志数据和贝叶斯系统发育比较方法,我们对过去的婚姻住所进行了统计重建,并推断出不同住所形式之间的文化变化率,结果表明原始印欧语是父居制,而原始马来-波利尼西亚语是母居制。母居制的不稳定性以及一旦获得父居制就很少丧失的现象,成为这两个语系的共同特征。