Houston John P, Gatz Jennifer L, Degenhardt Elisabeth K, Jamal Hassan H
US Medical Neuroscience, Lilly USA, LLC; Drop Code 4133, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Nov 2;3:276. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-276.
Rating scale items in a 6-week clinical trial of olanzapine versus placebo augmentation in patients with mixed bipolar disorder partially nonresponsive to ≥14 days of divalproex monotherapy were analyzed to characterize symptom patterns that could predict remission. At baseline, the two treatment groups were similar.
Factor analysis with Varimax rotation was performed post hoc on baseline items of the 21-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Backwards-elimination logistic regression ascertained factors predictive of protocol-defined endpoint remission (HDRS-21 score ≤ 8 and YMRS score ≤ 12) with subsequent determination of optimally predictive factor score cutoffs.Factors for Psychomotor activity (YMRS items for elevated mood, increased motor activity, and increased speech and HDRS-21 agitation item) and Guilt/Suicidality (HDRS-21 items for guilt and suicidality) significantly predicted endpoint remission in the divalproex+olanzapine group. No factor predicted remission in the divalproex+placebo group. Patients in the divalproex+olanzapine group with high pre-augmentation psychomotor activity (scores ≥10) were more likely to remit compared to those with lower psychomotor activity (odds ratio [OR] = 3.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-7.79), and patients with marginally high Guilt/Suicidality (scores ≥2) were less likely to remit than those with lower scores (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.13-1.03). Remission rates for divalproex+placebo vs. divalproex+olanzapine patients with high psychomotor activity scores were 22% vs. 45% (p = 0.08) and 33% vs. 48% (p = 0.29) for patients with low Guilt/Suicidality scores.
Patients who were partially nonresponsive to divalproex treatment with remaining high vs. low psychomotor activity levels or minimal vs. greater guilt/suicidality symptoms were more likely to remit with olanzapine augmentation.
ClinicalTrials.gov; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00402324?term=NCT00402324&rank=1, Identifier: NCT00402324.
在一项为期6周的临床试验中,对混合性双相情感障碍患者进行了分析,这些患者对丙戊酸单药治疗≥14天部分无反应,比较了奥氮平与安慰剂增效治疗,以确定可预测缓解的症状模式。在基线时,两个治疗组相似。
对21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-21)和杨氏躁狂量表(YMRS)的基线项目进行了事后的方差最大化旋转因子分析。向后逐步逻辑回归确定了预测方案定义的终点缓解(HDRS-21评分≤8且YMRS评分≤12)的因素,随后确定了最佳预测因子评分临界值。精神运动活动因子(YMRS中情绪高涨、运动活动增加、言语增多的项目以及HDRS-21中的激越项目)和内疚/自杀观念因子(HDRS-21中内疚和自杀观念的项目)在丙戊酸+奥氮平组中显著预测了终点缓解。在丙戊酸+安慰剂组中没有因子能预测缓解。与精神运动活动较低的患者相比,丙戊酸+奥氮平组中增强治疗前精神运动活动较高(评分≥10)的患者更有可能缓解(优势比[OR]=3.09,95%置信区间[CI]=1.22-7.79),而内疚/自杀观念略高(评分≥2)的患者比评分较低的患者缓解的可能性更小(OR=0.37,95%CI=0.13-1.03)。精神运动活动评分高的丙戊酸+安慰剂组与丙戊酸+奥氮平组患者的缓解率分别为22%和45%(p=0.08),内疚/自杀观念评分低的患者分别为33%和48%(p=0.29)。
对丙戊酸治疗部分无反应、精神运动活动水平高与低或内疚/自杀观念症状轻微与严重的患者,使用奥氮平增效治疗更有可能缓解。
ClinicalTrials.gov;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00402324?term=NCT00402324&rank=1,标识符:NCT00402324。