Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 19;11:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-137.
The major diagnostic classifications consider mania as a uni-dimensional illness. Factor analytic studies of acute mania are fewer compared to schizophrenia and depression. Evidence from factor analysis suggests more categories or subtypes than what is included in the classification systems. Studies have found that these factors can predict differences in treatment response and prognosis.
The sample included 131 patients consecutively admitted to an acute psychiatry unit over a period of one year. It included 76 (58%) males. The mean age was 44.05 years (SD = 15.6). Patients met International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) clinical diagnostic criteria for a manic episode. Patients with a diagnosis of mixed bipolar affective disorder were excluded. Participants were evaluated using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Exploratory factor analysis (principal component analysis) was carried out and factors with an eigenvalue > 1 were retained. The significance level for interpretation of factor loadings was 0.40. The unrotated component matrix identified five factors. Oblique rotation was then carried out to identify three factors which were clinically meaningful.
Unrotated principal component analysis extracted five factors. These five factors explained 65.36% of the total variance. Oblique rotation extracted 3 factors. Factor 1 corresponding to 'irritable mania' had significant loadings of irritability, increased motor activity/energy and disruptive aggressive behaviour. Factor 2 corresponding to 'elated mania' had significant loadings of elevated mood, language abnormalities/thought disorder, increased sexual interest and poor insight. Factor 3 corresponding to 'psychotic mania' had significant loadings of abnormalities in thought content, appearance, poor sleep and speech abnormalities.
Our findings identified three clinically meaningful factors corresponding to 'elated mania', 'irritable mania' and 'psychotic mania'. These findings support the multidimensional nature of manic symptoms. Further evidence is needed to support the existence of corresponding clinical subtypes.
主要的诊断分类将躁狂视为一种单一维度的疾病。与精神分裂症和抑郁症相比,对急性躁狂症的因子分析研究较少。来自因子分析的证据表明,比分类系统中包含的更多类别或亚型。研究发现,这些因素可以预测治疗反应和预后的差异。
该样本包括在一年内连续入住急性精神病病房的 131 名患者。其中 76 名(58%)为男性。平均年龄为 44.05 岁(SD=15.6)。患者符合国际疾病分类-10(ICD-10)躁狂发作的临床诊断标准。排除了混合双相情感障碍诊断的患者。参与者使用 Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS)进行评估。进行探索性因子分析(主成分分析),保留特征值>1 的因子。解释因子负荷的显著性水平为 0.40。未旋转的分量矩阵确定了五个因子。然后进行斜交旋转以识别具有临床意义的三个因子。
未旋转的主成分分析提取了五个因子。这五个因子解释了总方差的 65.36%。斜交旋转提取了 3 个因子。因子 1 对应于“易怒躁狂”,具有易怒、增加的运动活动/能量和破坏性行为的显著负荷。因子 2 对应于“兴高采烈的躁狂”,具有情绪升高、语言异常/思维障碍、性欲增加和洞察力差的显著负荷。因子 3 对应于“精神病性躁狂”,具有思维内容、外观、睡眠不佳和言语异常的显著负荷。
我们的发现确定了三个具有临床意义的因子,分别对应于“兴高采烈的躁狂”、“易怒躁狂”和“精神病性躁狂”。这些发现支持躁狂症状的多维性质。需要进一步的证据来支持相应的临床亚型的存在。