Oruç Ipek, Barton Jason J S
Human Vision and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Vis. 2010 Oct 18;10(12):20. doi: 10.1167/10.12.20.
Despite the common intuition that object recognition processes should be relatively scale invariant, a number of studies show that this is not the case. Using a critical-band masking paradigm, we examined the pattern of scale dependence of diagnostic spatial frequencies across a range of stimuli that varied in participants' prior experience and the 'ecological significance' of the stimuli, by which we mean the degree of universality and recency of the development of the stimulus in human culture, letters being an example of a culturally arbitrary stimulus and faces a universal one. We found scale dependence for letters, mirror-image letters, and novel shapes, consistent with prior results, as well as for inverted faces. However, upright faces showed a relatively scale-invariant pattern especially for face sizes that corresponded to those encountered in typical social interactions. This suggests an important difference between the processing of faces and other objects that may reflect their unique status as stimuli.
尽管人们通常直觉地认为物体识别过程应该相对尺度不变,但多项研究表明情况并非如此。我们采用临界带宽掩蔽范式,通过一系列在参与者先前经验和刺激的“生态意义”方面存在差异的刺激,研究了诊断性空间频率的尺度依赖性模式。这里所说的“生态意义”,是指刺激在人类文化中发展的普遍性和新近性程度,字母是文化上任意的刺激的一个例子,而面孔则是普遍的刺激。我们发现字母、镜像字母和新形状存在尺度依赖性,这与先前的结果一致,倒置面孔也存在尺度依赖性。然而,正立面孔表现出相对尺度不变的模式,尤其是对于与典型社交互动中遇到的面孔大小相对应的情况。这表明面孔与其他物体的处理之间存在重要差异,这可能反映了它们作为刺激的独特地位。