• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手指比率可预测早期猿类、尼安德特人和早期现代人中的一夫多妻制,但不能预测南方古猿。

Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

机构信息

School of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Hartley Building, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 22;278(1711):1556-63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1740. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2010.1740
PMID:21047863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3081742/
Abstract

Social behaviour of fossil hominoid species is notoriously difficult to predict owing to difficulties in estimating body size dimorphism from fragmentary remains and, in hominins, low canine size dimorphism. Recent studies have shown that the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D : 4D), a putative biomarker for prenatal androgen effects (PAEs), covaries with intra-sexual competition and social systems across haplorrhines; non-pair-bonded polygynous taxa have significantly lower 2D : 4D ratios (high PAE) than pair-bonded monogamous species. Here, we use proximal phalanx ratios of extant and fossil specimens to reconstruct the social systems of extinct hominoids. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Hispanopithecus laietanus and Ardipithecus ramidus have ratios consistent with polygynous extant species, whereas the ratio of Australopithecus afarensis is consistent with monogamous extant species. The early anatomically modern human Qafzeh 9 and Neanderthals have lower digit ratios than most contemporary human populations, indicating increased androgenization and possibly higher incidence of polygyny. Although speculative owing to small sample sizes, these results suggest that digit ratios represent a supplementary approach for elucidating the social systems of fossil hominins.

摘要

由于难以根据零碎遗骸估计体型二型性,而且在人科动物中犬齿的二型性也较低,因此化石人科动物的社会行为很难预测。最近的研究表明,第二至第四指骨比率(2D:4D)是一种产前雄激素效应(PAE)的潜在生物标志物,与haplorrhines 中的种内竞争和社会系统有关;非配对的一夫多妻制分类群的 2D:4D 比值(高 PAE)明显低于配对的一夫一妻制物种。在这里,我们使用现生物种和化石标本的近端指骨比率来重建已灭绝的人科动物的社会系统。Pierolapithecus catalaunicus、 Hispanopithecus laietanus 和 Ardipithecus ramidus 的比率与现生的一夫多妻制物种一致,而 Australopithecus afarensis 的比率与现生的一夫一妻制物种一致。早期的解剖学现代人类 Qafzeh 9 和尼安德特人比大多数现代人类群体具有更低的指骨比率,这表明雄激素化程度增加,可能一夫多妻制的发生率更高。尽管由于样本量小,这些结果具有推测性,但它们表明指骨比率代表了阐明化石人科动物社会系统的一种补充方法。

相似文献

1
Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.手指比率可预测早期猿类、尼安德特人和早期现代人中的一夫多妻制,但不能预测南方古猿。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 22;278(1711):1556-63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1740. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
2
Finger length ratios (2D:4D) in anthropoids implicate reduced prenatal androgens in social bonding.灵长类动物的手指长度比(2D:4D)暗示社会联系中胎儿期雄激素减少。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Mar;141(3):395-405. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21157.
3
Canine sexual dimorphism in was nearly human-like.犬科动物的性二型性几乎与人类相似。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116630118.
4
Symphyseal shape variation in extant and fossil hominoids, and the symphysis of Australopithecus bahrelghazali.现存和化石类人猿耻骨联合形态变异,以及巴赫雷扎勒南方古猿的耻骨联合
J Hum Evol. 2008 Jul;55(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
5
Asa Issie, Aramis and the origin of Australopithecus.阿萨·伊西、阿拉米斯与南方古猿的起源
Nature. 2006 Apr 13;440(7086):883-9. doi: 10.1038/nature04629.
6
Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar.再探阿法南方古猿股骨远端的形态变异:对哈达尔地区分类学和功能多样性的启示
J Hum Evol. 2002 May;42(5):609-26. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0545.
7
Sexual dimorphism of body size in an African fossil ape, Nacholapithecus kerioi.非洲古猿纳赫勒皮托斯的体型大小的性二态性。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Oct;123:129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Pierolapithecus and the functional morphology of Miocene ape hand phalanges: paleobiological and evolutionary implications.皮尔洛猿与中新世猿类手部指骨的功能形态学:古生物学及进化意义
J Hum Evol. 2009 Sep;57(3):284-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
9
Size and shape variation in Australopithecus afarensis proximal femora.阿法南方古猿近端股骨的大小和形状变异
J Hum Evol. 2006 Sep;51(3):217-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
10
Careful climbing in the Miocene: the forelimbs of Ardipithecus ramidus and humans are primitive.中新世时期的谨慎攀爬:拉密达地猿和人类的前肢较为原始。
Science. 2009 Oct 2;326(5949):70e1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantum Leaps in Human Biocultural Evolution and the Relationship to Cranial Capacity.人类生物文化进化的巨大飞跃及其与脑容量的关系
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;13(4):1030. doi: 10.3390/life13041030.
2
Oxytocin and vasotocin receptor variation and the evolution of human prosociality.催产素和加压素受体变异与人类亲社会性的进化
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2022 May 5;11:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100139. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Firstborn sex defines early childhood growth of subsequent siblings.头胎性别决定了后续同胞的幼儿期生长。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 13;288(1942):20202329. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2329.
4
Mate Choice and the Persistence of Maternal Mortality.择偶与母婴死亡率的持续存在。
Reprod Sci. 2019 Apr;26(4):450-458. doi: 10.1177/1933719118812730. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Self-domestication in Homo sapiens: Insights from comparative genomics.智人自我驯化:比较基因组学的启示。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0185306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185306. eCollection 2017.
6
One pedigree we all may have come from - did Adam and Eve have the chromosome 2 fusion?我们可能都来自同一个谱系——亚当和夏娃有2号染色体融合吗?
Mol Cytogenet. 2016 Sep 26;9:72. doi: 10.1186/s13039-016-0283-3. eCollection 2016.
7
Stay, stray or something in-between? A comment on Wlodarski et al.留下、偏离还是介于两者之间?对沃洛达尔斯基等人的评论
Biol Lett. 2016 May;12(5). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1069.
8
ARE WITHIN-SEX MATING STRATEGY PHENOTYPES AN EVOLUTIONARY STABLE STRATEGY?同性交配策略表型是一种进化稳定策略吗?
Hum Ethol Bull. 2015;30(1):99-108.
9
Stay or stray? Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women.留下还是离开?男性和女性中替代交配策略表型的证据。
Biol Lett. 2015 Feb;11(2):20140977. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0977.
10
Genetic influences on the development of grip strength in adolescence.青少年握力发育的遗传影响。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Jun;154(2):189-200. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22492.

本文引用的文献

1
Polygamy, economic security and well-being of retired Zulu migrant workers.一夫多妻制、退休祖鲁族农民工的经济保障与福祉
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1990 Jul;5(3):205-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00116999.
2
Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand.2D:4D 比值的荟萃分析显示右手的性别差异更大。
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):619-30. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21054.
3
Body size and body shape in early hominins - implications of the Gona pelvis.早期人科动物的体型和身体形态——贡纳骨盆的启示。
J Hum Evol. 2010 Feb;58(2):166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
4
Brief communication: The distribution of perikymata on Qafzeh anterior teeth.简报交流:卡夫泽前牙的牙釉质横纹分布。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Jan;141(1):152-7. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21158.
5
Finger length ratios (2D:4D) in anthropoids implicate reduced prenatal androgens in social bonding.灵长类动物的手指长度比(2D:4D)暗示社会联系中胎儿期雄激素减少。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Mar;141(3):395-405. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21157.
6
Digit ratios do not serve as anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome.数字比率不能作为多囊卵巢综合征临床表型中产前雄激素暴露的解剖学证据。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jan;25(1):204-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep363. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
7
Techniques for siding manual phalanges.侧方切开术治疗掌指骨
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Dec 15;193(1-3):84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
8
Fingers as a marker of prenatal androgen exposure.手指作为产前雄激素暴露的标志。
Endocrinology. 2009 Nov;150(11):5119-24. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0774. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
9
Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus.根据拉密达地猿重新审视人类起源。
Science. 2009 Oct 2;326(5949):74e1-8.
10
Careful climbing in the Miocene: the forelimbs of Ardipithecus ramidus and humans are primitive.中新世时期的谨慎攀爬:拉密达地猿和人类的前肢较为原始。
Science. 2009 Oct 2;326(5949):70e1-8.