• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为碰撞严重程度函数的胸部损伤风险——与现实生活中的碰撞相比,使用WorldSID进行的汽车对汽车侧面碰撞试验

Thoracic Injury Risk as a Function of Crash Severity - Car-to-car Side Impact Tests with WorldSID Compared to Real-life Crashes.

作者信息

Sunnevång Cecilia, Rosén Erik, Boström Ola, Lechelt Ulf

机构信息

Autoliv Research, Vårgårda, Sweden Volvo Car Corporation, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:159-68.

PMID:21050600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3242565/
Abstract

Side airbags reduce the risk of fatal injury by approximately 30%. Due to limited real-life data the risk reducing effect for serious injury has not yet been established. Since side airbags are mainly designed and validated for crash severities used in available test procedures little is known regarding the protective effect when severity increases.The objective of this study was to understand for which crash severities AIS3+ thorax occupant protection in car-to-car nearside collisions need to and can be improved. The aim was fulfilled by means of real life data, for older cars without side airbag, and a series of car-to-car tests performed with the WorldSID 50%-ile in modern and older cars at different impact speeds.The real life data showed that the risk of AIS3+ injury was highest for the thorax followed by the pelvis and head. For both non-senior and senior occupants, most thorax injuries were sustained at lateral delta-v from 20 km/h to 40 km/h. In this severity range, senior occupants were found to have approximately four times higher risk of thoracic injury than non-senior occupants. The crash tests at lateral impact speed 55 km/h (delta-v 32 km/h) confirmed the improved performance at severities represented in current legal and rating tests. The structural integrity of the modern car impacted at 70 km/h showed a potential for improved side impact protection by interior countermeasures.

摘要

侧面安全气囊可将致命伤害风险降低约30%。由于实际生活数据有限,其对重伤的风险降低效果尚未确定。由于侧面安全气囊主要是针对现有测试程序中使用的碰撞严重程度进行设计和验证的,因此对于严重程度增加时的保护效果知之甚少。本研究的目的是了解在何种碰撞严重程度下,在汽车对汽车的近侧碰撞中,AIS3+胸部乘员保护需要并能够得到改善。通过实际生活数据(针对没有侧面安全气囊的旧车)以及在现代和旧车中以不同碰撞速度对WorldSID 50%百分位模型进行的一系列汽车对汽车测试实现了这一目标。实际生活数据表明,AIS3+损伤风险最高的部位是胸部,其次是骨盆和头部。对于非老年和老年乘员而言,大多数胸部损伤发生在横向速度变化为20 km/h至40 km/h时。在此严重程度范围内,发现老年乘员胸部受伤的风险是非老年乘员的约四倍。横向碰撞速度为55 km/h(速度变化32 km/h)的碰撞测试证实了在当前法律和评级测试所代表的严重程度下性能有所提升。以70 km/h速度碰撞的现代汽车的结构完整性表明,通过内部对策有改善侧面碰撞保护的潜力。

相似文献

1
Thoracic Injury Risk as a Function of Crash Severity - Car-to-car Side Impact Tests with WorldSID Compared to Real-life Crashes.作为碰撞严重程度函数的胸部损伤风险——与现实生活中的碰撞相比,使用WorldSID进行的汽车对汽车侧面碰撞试验
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:159-68.
2
Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts.后排乘客胸部在近侧碰撞中的保护
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:3-12.
3
Census study of real-life near-side crashes with modern side airbag-equipped vehicles in the United States.美国配备现代侧面安全气囊车辆现实生活中近侧碰撞的普查研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S117-24. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1022895.
4
Assessment of Bilateral Thoracic Loading on the Near-Side Occupant Due to Occupant-to-Occupant Interaction in Vehicle Crash Tests.在车辆碰撞试验中,因乘员间相互作用对近侧乘员双侧胸部负荷的评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S217-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061665.
5
Real-life fatal outcome in car-to-car near-side impacts--implications for improved protection considering age and crash severity.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;10(2):194-203. doi: 10.1080/15389580802594127.
6
Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity.适应正面碰撞多样性的限载器展开。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S43-S49. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1702648. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Census study of fatal car-to-car intersection crashes in Sweden involving modern vehicles.瑞典涉及现代车辆的致命车对车交叉口碰撞的人口普查研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;12(4):333-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.576285.
8
Factors associated with chest injuries to front seat occupants in frontal impacts.与正面碰撞中前排乘客胸部受伤相关的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S37-S42. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1654606. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
9
Improving the Chest Protection of Elderly Occupants in Frontal Crashes Using SMART Load Limiters.使用智能负载限制器提高老年驾乘人员在正面碰撞中的胸部保护。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S77-86. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064528.
10
Factors influencing the patterns of injuries and outcomes in car versus car crashes compared to sport utility, van, or pick-up truck versus car crashes: Crash Injury Research Engineering Network Study.与运动型多用途汽车、厢式货车或皮卡与汽车碰撞相比,汽车与汽车碰撞中影响损伤模式和结果的因素:碰撞损伤研究工程网络研究。
J Trauma. 2001 Nov;51(5):975-90. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00024.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Factors of the Fatality of Motor Vehicle Passengers Involved in Far-Side Lateral Collisions: A National Crash Database Study.涉及远侧横向碰撞的机动车乘客死亡的预测因素:一项全国性碰撞数据库研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 21;11(10):1496. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101496.
2
Methodology for Evaluation of WIAMan Injury Assessment Reference Curves Using Whole Body Match-Paired Data.基于全身匹配对数据评估 WIAMan 损伤评估参考曲线的方法。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Nov;49(11):3128-3142. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02770-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
Pedestrian injury risk functions based on contour lines of equal injury severity using real world pedestrian/passenger-car accident data.基于使用真实世界行人/乘用车事故数据的等损伤严重度轮廓线的行人损伤风险函数。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2013;57:145-54.
4
Response of the Worldwide Side Impact Dummy (WorldSID) to Localized Constant-Speed Impacts.全球侧面碰撞假人(WorldSID)对局部恒速碰撞的响应。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:231-41.

本文引用的文献

1
Injury risk curves for the WorldSID 50th male dummy.世界SID第50百分位男性假人的受伤风险曲线。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2009 Nov;53:443-76. doi: 10.4271/2009-22-0016.
2
Real-life fatal outcome in car-to-car near-side impacts--implications for improved protection considering age and crash severity.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;10(2):194-203. doi: 10.1080/15389580802594127.
3
Characteristics of older drivers who self-limit their driving.自我限制驾驶的老年驾驶员的特征。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:245-54.
4
Efficacy of side airbags in reducing driver deaths in driver-side car and SUV collisions.侧面安全气囊在减少轿车和SUV驾驶员侧碰撞中驾驶员死亡方面的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Jun;8(2):162-70. doi: 10.1080/15389580601173875.
5
Structural and material changes in the aging thorax and their role in crash protection for older occupants.衰老胸部的结构和材料变化及其在老年乘员碰撞保护中的作用。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2005 Nov;49:231-49. doi: 10.4271/2005-22-0011.
6
Lateral impact injuries with side airbag deployments--a descriptive study.配备侧面安全气囊展开装置的侧面撞击损伤——一项描述性研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
7
On the fatal crash experience of older drivers.关于老年驾驶员的致命撞车事故经历。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:371-91.
8
Investigation of the performance of safety systems for protection of the elderly.老年人安全保护系统性能研究。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:361-9.
9
Responses of side impact dummies in sled tests.雪橇试验中侧面碰撞假人的响应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 May;37(3):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.12.007.
10
Efficacy of side air bags in reducing driver deaths in driver-side collisions.侧面安全气囊在减少驾驶员侧碰撞中驾驶员死亡方面的功效。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Mar 15;159(6):556-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh087.