Ageing and Health, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2099-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x.
To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.
Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.
Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.
change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry.
Short Physical Performance Battery, health-related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.
One hundred seventy-nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6-month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P = .002) and the pedometer plus group (P = .04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.
The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.
确定行为改变干预(BCI)是否结合计步器在增加久坐老年女性身体活动方面的有效性。
前瞻性随机对照试验。
苏格兰邓迪市的初级保健机构。
204 名年龄在 70 岁及以上的久坐女性。
6 个月的 BCI、BCI 加计步器(计步器加)或常规护理。
通过加速度计测量的日常活动计数的变化。
简短身体表现电池、健康相关生活质量、抑郁和焦虑、跌倒和国家卫生服务资源使用。
204 名女性中有 179 名(88%)完成了 6 个月的试验。退出率最高的是 BCI 组(15/68),其次是计步器加组(8/68),然后是对照组(2/64)。在调整基线差异后,BCI 组在 3 个月时的加速度计计数显著高于对照组(P =.002)和计步器加组(P =.04)。到 6 个月时,两个干预组的加速度计计数都已降至不再与基线有统计学显著差异的水平。次要结局没有显著变化。
BCI 可有效客观地增加久坐老年女性的身体活动量。提供计步器并没有在身体活动方面带来额外的好处,但可能激励参与者继续参与试验。