Suppr超能文献

计步器能否增加久坐老年女性的身体活动量?一项随机对照试验。

Do pedometers increase physical activity in sedentary older women? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Ageing and Health, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2099-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.

INTERVENTIONS

Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Short Physical Performance Battery, health-related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6-month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P = .002) and the pedometer plus group (P = .04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.

摘要

目的

确定行为改变干预(BCI)是否结合计步器在增加久坐老年女性身体活动方面的有效性。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

苏格兰邓迪市的初级保健机构。

参与者

204 名年龄在 70 岁及以上的久坐女性。

干预措施

6 个月的 BCI、BCI 加计步器(计步器加)或常规护理。

主要结局

通过加速度计测量的日常活动计数的变化。

次要结局

简短身体表现电池、健康相关生活质量、抑郁和焦虑、跌倒和国家卫生服务资源使用。

结果

204 名女性中有 179 名(88%)完成了 6 个月的试验。退出率最高的是 BCI 组(15/68),其次是计步器加组(8/68),然后是对照组(2/64)。在调整基线差异后,BCI 组在 3 个月时的加速度计计数显著高于对照组(P =.002)和计步器加组(P =.04)。到 6 个月时,两个干预组的加速度计计数都已降至不再与基线有统计学显著差异的水平。次要结局没有显著变化。

结论

BCI 可有效客观地增加久坐老年女性的身体活动量。提供计步器并没有在身体活动方面带来额外的好处,但可能激励参与者继续参与试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验