National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1456-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01141.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
There has been a dramatic increase in the types of microdata, and this holds great promise for health services research. However, legislative efforts to protect individual privacy have reduced the flow of health care data for research purposes and increased costs and delays, affecting the quality of analysis.
This paper provides an overview of the challenges raised by concerns about data confidentiality in the context of health services research, the current methodologies used to ensure data security, and a description of one successful approach to balancing access and privacy. Materials and Methods. We analyze the issues of access and privacy using a conceptual framework based on balancing the risk of reidentification with the utility associated with data analysis. The guiding principle should be to generate released data that are as close to the maximum acceptable risk as possible. HIPAA and other privacy measures can perhaps be seen as having had the effect of lowering the "maximum acceptable risk" level and rendering some data unreleasable.
We discuss the levels of risk and utility associated with different types of data used in health services research and the ability to link data from multiple sources as well as current models of data sharing and their limitations.
One particularly compelling approach is to establish a remote access "data enclave," where statistical protections are applied to the data, technical protections ensure compliance with data-sharing requirements, and operational controls limit researchers' access to the data they need for their specific research questions.
We recommend reducing delays in access to data for research, increasing the use of remote access data enclaves, and disseminating knowledge and promulgating standards for best practices related to data protection.
微观数据的类型急剧增加,这为卫生服务研究带来了巨大的希望。然而,为保护个人隐私而进行的立法工作减少了医疗数据用于研究的流通,并增加了成本和延迟,影响了分析的质量。
本文概述了在卫生服务研究背景下,人们对数据保密性的担忧所带来的挑战,当前用于确保数据安全的方法,以及一种成功平衡访问和隐私的方法的描述。
我们使用基于平衡重新识别风险与数据分析相关效用的概念框架来分析访问和隐私问题。指导原则应该是生成尽可能接近最大可接受风险的发布数据。HIPAA 和其他隐私措施可能被视为降低了“最大可接受风险”水平,并使一些数据无法发布。
我们讨论了与卫生服务研究中使用的不同类型的数据相关的风险和效用水平,以及链接来自多个来源的数据的能力,以及当前的数据共享模型及其局限性。
一种特别引人注目的方法是建立一个远程访问“数据飞地”,在该飞地中对数据应用统计保护,技术保护确保了数据共享要求的合规性,并且操作控制限制了研究人员对其特定研究问题所需数据的访问。
我们建议减少研究数据访问的延迟,增加远程访问数据飞地的使用,并传播与数据保护相关的最佳实践知识和颁布标准。