Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Jul;25(7):811-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03870.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacies of 1550- and 1565-nm Er:glass lasers in the treatment of periorbital wrinkles and to evaluate histological changes after treatment.
Twenty patients received five treatments each at 3-week intervals. The right periorbital area was exposed to the 1550-nm Er:glass laser and the left periorbital area was exposed to the 1565-nm Er:glass laser. Clinical improvement was evaluated by two blinded physicians who assessed comparative photographs using a four-point scale at baseline and 3 months after the final treatments. Skin biopsies were performed in five volunteers before treatment and at 3 months after the final treatment.
The mean improvement scores 3 months after treatment with the 1550- and 1565-nm Er:glass lasers were 2.25±0.62 and 2.28±0.59 respectively. Histological examination revealed increased epidermal thickening and decreased solar elastosis 3 months after the final laser treatments.
Both 1550- and 1565-nm Er:glass lasers are safe and effective modalities in the treatment of periorbital wrinkles with no significant differences between the two lasers.
本研究旨在比较 1550nm 和 1565nmEr:glass 激光治疗眶周皱纹的临床疗效,并评估治疗后的组织学变化。
20 名患者每 3 周接受 5 次治疗。右侧眶周区域暴露于 1550nmEr:glass 激光,左侧眶周区域暴露于 1565nmEr:glass 激光。两名盲法医师在基线和最后一次治疗后 3 个月使用四点量表评估比较照片,评估临床改善情况。在治疗前和最后一次治疗后 3 个月,对 5 名志愿者进行皮肤活检。
治疗后 3 个月,1550nm 和 1565nmEr:glass 激光的平均改善评分分别为 2.25±0.62 和 2.28±0.59。组织学检查显示,最后一次激光治疗后 3 个月,表皮增厚,太阳弹性纤维减少。
1550nm 和 1565nmEr:glass 激光治疗眶周皱纹均安全有效,两种激光之间无显著差异。