• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用发表研究中的正常对照数据对核心哈氏-Reitan 测验的表现准确性进行水平评估:与临床样本中的现有常模进行比较。

Level of performance accuracy for core Halstead-Reitan measures by pooling normal controls from published studies: comparison with existing norms in a clinical sample.

机构信息

The University of Texas at Dallas, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):3-18. doi: 10.2466/03.22.27.PMS.111.4.3-18.

DOI:10.2466/03.22.27.PMS.111.4.3-18
PMID:21058581
Abstract

The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery offers a multifaceted, empirically supported interpretive framework for neuropsychological assessment founded upon raw scores referenced to a brain-damaged sample. Complementary approaches have used T scores from normal samples often composed of community volunteers or medical patients, augmented by regression. By pooling normal controls of all types from published studies, a sample large enough for stratification of core Halstead-Reitan measures by age and education was obtained (206 studies, N1 = 17,980). Comparisons based on T scores with two published normative systems in an outpatient sample produced a continuum: liberal norms for medical patients, intermediate pooled values from many types of subjects, and stringent norms for community volunteers. Features recommending clinical application of pooled norms include enhanced accuracy in clinical situations precluding a full battery, few empty cells or inversions for nonelderly subjects, and a screening application based upon a very large Trail Making Test sample (Trails B: n > 14,000).

摘要

《哈尔斯特德-雷坦神经心理学测验成套测验》为神经心理学评估提供了一个多方面的、有经验支持的解释框架,其基础是基于脑损伤样本的原始分数。补充方法使用来自正常样本的 T 分数,这些正常样本通常由社区志愿者或医疗患者组成,并通过回归进行扩充。通过汇集来自已发表研究的所有类型的正常对照,获得了一个足够大的样本,可以按年龄和教育程度对核心哈尔斯特德-雷坦测量进行分层(206 项研究,N1=17980)。在门诊样本中,基于 T 分数与两个已发表的规范系统进行的比较产生了一个连续体:针对医疗患者的宽松规范、来自多种类型受试者的中间汇总值以及针对社区志愿者的严格规范。推荐使用汇总规范进行临床应用的特征包括:在排除完整测试的情况下,在临床情况下提高准确性、对于非老年受试者,空单元格或反转的情况较少、以及基于非常大的 Trail Making Test 样本的筛选应用(Trails B:n>14000)。

相似文献

1
Level of performance accuracy for core Halstead-Reitan measures by pooling normal controls from published studies: comparison with existing norms in a clinical sample.运用发表研究中的正常对照数据对核心哈氏-Reitan 测验的表现准确性进行水平评估:与临床样本中的现有常模进行比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):3-18. doi: 10.2466/03.22.27.PMS.111.4.3-18.
2
Using the Halstead-Reitan Battery to diagnose brain damage: a comparison of the predictive power of traditional techniques to Rohling's Interpretive Method.使用霍尔斯特德-雷坦成套神经心理测验来诊断脑损伤:传统技术与罗林解释法预测能力的比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Nov;17(4):531-43. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.4.531.27938.
3
Statistical relationships and discriminative accuracy of the Halstead-Reitan, Luria-Nebraska, and Wechsler IQ scores in the identification of brain damage.在脑损伤识别中,霍尔斯特德-赖坦、鲁利亚-内布拉斯加和韦氏智商分数的统计关系及判别准确性。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1985 Jun;7(3):211-23. doi: 10.1080/01688638508401254.
4
Children's version of the Alternative Impairment Index: a pilot study.儿童版替代损伤指数:一项试点研究。
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Aug;81(1):217-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.1.217.
5
Sensitivity of the Halstead and Wechsler Test Batteries to brain damage: Evidence from Reitan's original validation sample.霍尔斯特德和韦克斯勒测验组合对脑损伤的敏感性:来自瑞坦原始验证样本的证据。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Jun;20(2):221-9. doi: 10.1080/13854040590947443.
6
Sensitivity to brain dysfunction of the Halstead-Reitan vs an ability-focused neuropsychological battery.哈雷特-雷顿神经心理成套测验与以能力为导向的神经心理成套测验对脑功能障碍的敏感性比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;22(5):813-25. doi: 10.1080/13854040701625846.
7
A reference scale method for constructing neuropsychological test batteries.一种构建神经心理测试组合的参照量表法。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987 Aug;9(4):376-92. doi: 10.1080/01688638708405058.
8
Norming subjects for the Halstead Reitan battery.为哈雷特-雷顿神经心理成套测验设定常模对象。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Jun;20(4):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.11.002. Epub 2004 Dec 29.
9
The General Neuropsychological Deficit Scale and Halstead Impairment Index: comparison of severity.一般神经心理缺陷量表与霍尔斯特德损伤指数:严重程度比较
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Jun;78(3 Pt 1):888-90. doi: 10.1177/003151259407800342.
10
The influence of age, education, IQ, gender, and alcohol abuse on Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery performance.年龄、教育程度、智商、性别及酒精滥用对哈尔斯特德-雷坦神经心理成套测验表现的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jul;45(4):484-512. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198907)45:4<484::aid-jclp2270450402>3.0.co;2-l.

引用本文的文献

1
COMT Val 158 Met polymorphism is associated with nonverbal cognition following mild traumatic brain injury.儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)缬氨酸158位甲硫氨酸多态性与轻度创伤性脑损伤后的非言语认知相关。
Neurogenetics. 2016 Jan;17(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10048-015-0467-8. Epub 2015 Nov 17.