Andrés Pilar, Guerrini Chiara, Phillips Louise H, Perfect Timothy J
School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(2):101-23. doi: 10.1080/87565640701884212.
One of the major accounts of cognitive aging states that age effects are related to a deficiency of inhibitory mechanisms (Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Given that inhibition has traditionally been associated with the frontal cortex, and that the frontal cortex deteriorates early with age (Raz, 2000), this is consistent with the frontal hypothesis of aging (West, 1996). However, not all inhibitory processes require executive control, and so they are not all equally supported by the frontal cortex. As a consequence, one would expect dissociations between inhibitory tasks in the sense of a greater susceptibility of executive/frontal inhibition to aging. Based on Nigg's (2000) working inhibition taxonomy, we tested this hypothesis by combining inhibitory paradigms with different levels of executive control within the same participants. The results showed that age affects Stroop interference but not negative priming (Experiment 1) and stop signal responsiveness but not negative priming (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that tasks with a high executive (or effortful) inhibitory control are more sensitive to aging than tasks with a lower executive (more automatic) inhibitory control. The results are discussed in relation to the inhibitory and frontal accounts of aging.
认知衰老的主要观点之一认为,年龄效应与抑制机制的缺陷有关(哈舍和扎克斯,1988年)。鉴于抑制作用传统上与额叶皮层相关,且额叶皮层会随着年龄增长而较早衰退(拉兹,2000年),这与衰老的额叶假说相符(韦斯特,1996年)。然而,并非所有抑制过程都需要执行控制,因此它们并非都同样受到额叶皮层的支持。结果,人们可能会预期,在执行/额叶抑制对衰老更敏感的意义上,抑制任务之间会出现分离。基于尼格(2000年)的工作抑制分类法,我们通过在同一参与者中结合不同执行控制水平的抑制范式来检验这一假设。结果表明,年龄会影响斯特鲁普干扰,但不影响负启动(实验1),年龄会影响停止信号反应,但不影响负启动(实验2)。这些发现表明,具有高执行(或费力)抑制控制的任务比具有低执行(更自动)抑制控制的任务对衰老更敏感。我们将结合衰老的抑制和额叶观点来讨论这些结果。