Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Mar;19(3):254-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
To address the need for standardization of osteoarthritis (OA) phenotypes by examining the effect of heterogeneity among symptomatic (SOA) and radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA) phenotypes.
Descriptions of OA phenotypes of the 28 studies involved in the TREAT-OA consortium were collected. We investigated whether different OA definitions result in different association results by creating various hip OA definitions in one large population based cohort (the Rotterdam Study I (RSI)) and testing those for association with gender, age and body mass index using one-way ANOVA. For ROA, we standardized the hip-, knee- and hand ROA definitions and calculated prevalence's of ROA before and after standardization in nine cohort studies. This procedure could only be performed in cohort studies and standardization of SOA definitions was not feasible at this moment.
In this consortium, all studies with SOA phenotypes (knee, hip and hand) used a different definition and/or assessment of OA status. For knee-, hip- and hand ROA five, four and seven different definitions were used, respectively. Different hip ROA definitions do lead to different association results. For example, we showed in the RSI that hip OA defined as "at least definite joint space narrowing (JSN) and one definite osteophyte" was not associated with gender (P =0.22), but defined as "at least one definite osteophyte" was significantly associated with gender (P=3×10(-9)). Therefore, a standardization process was undertaken for ROA definitions. Before standardization a wide range of ROA prevalence's was observed in the nine cohorts studied. After standardization the range in prevalence of knee- and hip ROA was small.
Phenotype definitions influence the prevalence of OA and association with clinical variables. ROA phenotypes within the TREAT-OA consortium were standardized to reduce heterogeneity and improve power in future genetics studies.
通过研究症状性(SOA)和放射学性骨关节炎(ROA)表型的异质性,探讨骨关节炎(OA)表型标准化的必要性。
收集了参与 TREAT-OA 联盟的 28 项研究中 OA 表型的描述。我们通过在一个大型人群基础队列(鹿特丹研究 I(RSI))中创建各种髋关节 OA 定义,并使用单因素方差分析测试这些定义与性别、年龄和体重指数的关联,来研究不同的 OA 定义是否会导致不同的关联结果。对于 ROA,我们对髋关节、膝关节和手部 ROA 定义进行了标准化,并在 9 项队列研究中计算了 ROA 的标准化前后的患病率。此程序只能在队列研究中进行,目前还无法对 SOA 定义进行标准化。
在该联盟中,所有具有 SOA 表型(膝关节、髋关节和手部)的研究都使用了不同的 OA 状态定义和/或评估方法。对于膝关节、髋关节和手部 ROA,分别使用了五种、四种和七种不同的定义。不同的髋关节 ROA 定义确实会导致不同的关联结果。例如,我们在 RSI 中表明,定义为“至少存在明确的关节间隙狭窄(JSN)和一个明确的骨赘”的髋关节 OA 与性别无关(P=0.22),但定义为“至少存在一个明确的骨赘”的髋关节 OA 与性别显著相关(P=3×10(-9))。因此,我们对 ROA 定义进行了标准化处理。在标准化之前,在研究的九个队列中观察到 ROA 患病率的范围很广。标准化后,膝关节和髋关节 ROA 的患病率范围较小。
表型定义会影响 OA 的患病率和与临床变量的关联。TREAT-OA 联盟内的 ROA 表型已标准化,以减少异质性并提高未来遗传学研究的效能。