• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达比加群酯与华法林在伴有房颤及既往短暂性脑缺血发作或脑卒中患者中的比较:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。

Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2010 Dec;9(12):1157-1163. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70274-X. Epub 2010 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70274-X
PMID:21059484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Randomised Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial, dabigatran reduced occurrence of both stroke and haemorrhage compared with warfarin in patients who had atrial fibrillation and were at increased risk of stroke. We aimed to assess the effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

METHODS

In the RE-LY trial, 18,113 patients from 967 centres in 44 countries were randomly assigned to 110 mg or 150 mg dabigatran twice daily or to warfarin dose adjusted to international normalised ratio 2·0 to 3·0. Median follow-up was 2·0 years (IQR 1·14-2·86), and the primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major haemorrhage. Patients and investigators were aware of whether patients received warfarin or dabigatran, but not of dabigatran dose, and event adjudicators were masked to treatment. In a predefined analysis, we investigated the outcomes of the RE-LY trial in subgroups of patients with or without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. RE-LY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00262600.

FINDINGS

Within the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 1195 patients were from the 110 mg dabigatran group, 1233 from the 150 mg dabigatran group, and 1195 from the warfarin group. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 65 patients (2·78% per year) on warfarin compared with 55 (2·32% per year) on 110 mg dabigatran (relative risk 0·84, 95% CI 0·58-1·20) and 51 (2·07% per year) on 150 mg dabigatran (0·75, 0·52-1·08). The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients on 110 mg dabigatran (RR 0·66, 95% CI 0·48-0·90) and similar in those on 150 mg dabigatran (RR 1·01; 95% CI 0·77-1·34) compared with those on warfarin. The effects of both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin were not significantly different between patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack and those without for any of the outcomes from RE-LY apart from vascular death (110 mg group compared with warfarin group, interaction p=0·038).

INTERPRETATION

The effects of 110 mg dabigatran and 150 mg dabigatran twice daily in patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack are consistent with those of other patients in RE-LY, for whom, compared with warfarin, 150 mg dabigatran reduced stroke or systemic embolism and 110 mg dabligatran was non-inferior. [corrected] Most effects of both dabigatran doses were consistent in patients with versus those without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim.

摘要

背景

在随机评估长期抗凝治疗试验(RE-LY 试验)中,与华法林相比,达比加群降低了伴有心房颤动且有更高卒中风险的患者发生卒中及出血的风险。我们旨在评估与华法林相比,达比加群在有既往卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作史的亚组患者中的作用。

方法

在 RE-LY 试验中,来自 44 个国家的 967 个中心的 18113 例患者被随机分配至 110mg 或 150mg 达比加群每日两次或调整至国际标准化比值 2.0-3.0 的华法林治疗。中位随访时间为 2.0 年(IQR 1.14-2.86),主要终点为卒中和全身性栓塞。主要安全性结局为大出血。患者和研究者知晓患者接受的是华法林或达比加群治疗,但不了解达比加群的剂量,且事件裁决者对治疗情况设盲。在预先设定的分析中,我们在有或无既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史的患者亚组中调查了 RE-LY 试验的结局。RE-LY 在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT00262600。

发现

在有既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史的亚组患者中,110mg 达比加群组有 1195 例患者,150mg 达比加群组有 1233 例患者,华法林组有 1195 例患者。华法林组发生卒中或全身性栓塞 65 例(每年 2.78%),而 110mg 达比加群组为 55 例(每年 2.32%)(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.58-1.20),150mg 达比加群组为 51 例(每年 2.07%)(RR 0.75,0.52-1.08)。110mg 达比加群组大出血发生率显著低于华法林组(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.48-0.90),与华法林组相似(RR 1.01;95%CI 0.77-1.34),而 150mg 达比加群组的发生率与华法林组无显著差异。除血管性死亡外(110mg 组与华法林组,交互 P=0.038),与华法林相比,两种剂量的达比加群在有既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史与无既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史的患者中的作用无显著差异。

结论

与其他 RE-LY 患者相比,110mg 和 150mg 达比加群每日两次在有既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史的患者中的作用与其他患者一致,与华法林相比,150mg 达比加群降低了卒中或全身性栓塞风险,而 110mg 达比加群无显著差异。两种达比加群剂量的大多数作用在有既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史与无既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作史的患者中一致。

资助

勃林格殷格翰。

相似文献

1
Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.达比加群酯与华法林在伴有房颤及既往短暂性脑缺血发作或脑卒中患者中的比较:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Dec;9(12):1157-1163. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70274-X. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
2
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial.达比加群酯与华法林在不同国际标准化比值控制水平下预防心房颤动卒中的疗效和安全性:RE-LY 试验分析。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 18;376(9745):975-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61194-4.
3
Apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a subgroup analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial.阿哌沙班与华法林在伴有心房颤动和既往卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的患者中的比较:ARISTOTLE 试验的亚组分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jun;11(6):503-11. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70092-3. Epub 2012 May 8.
4
Concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy with dabigatran or warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial.在随机评估长期抗凝治疗试验(RE-LY 试验)中,达比加群或华法林与抗血小板治疗同时使用。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 5;127(5):634-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.115386. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack.达比加群酯与华法林预防有房颤病史且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中的成本效益比较。
Stroke. 2012 Mar;43(3):881-3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.641027. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
6
Risks for stroke, bleeding, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dabigatran or warfarin in relation to the CHADS2 score: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.在接受达比加群或华法林治疗的房颤患者中,与 CHADS2 评分相关的卒中和出血风险及死亡率:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):660-7, W204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00004.
7
Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin in management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in UK context: quantitative benefit-harm and economic analyses.达比加群酯与华法林在英国非瓣膜性心房颤动管理中的比较:定量获益-危害和经济分析。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 31;343:d6333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6333.
8
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis.达比加群酯与华法林在伴有基线肾功能异常的房颤患者中的疗效和安全性比较:RE-LY(随机评估长期抗凝治疗)试验分析。
Circulation. 2014 Mar 4;129(9):961-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003628. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and symptomatic heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.达比加群酯与华法林在伴有心房颤动和症状性心力衰竭患者中的比较:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Sep;15(9):1053-61. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft111. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: a Canadian payer perspective.达比加群酯用于预防房颤卒中及全身性栓塞的成本效果分析:加拿大支付者视角。
Thromb Haemost. 2011 May;105(5):908-19. doi: 10.1160/TH11-02-0089. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebrovascular Management Considerations in Patients on AATs.接受抗凝血酶治疗患者的脑血管管理考量
J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3420. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103420.
2
Residual Risk of Recurrent Stroke Despite Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心房颤动患者抗凝治疗后复发性卒中的残余风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1337.
3
Residual Stroke Risk Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Prescribed Oral Anticoagulants: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis From COMBINE AF.
服用口服抗凝剂的心房颤动患者的残余卒中风险:来自 COMBINE AF 的患者水平荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e034758. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034758. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Outcomes of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation.非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂用于房颤相关缺血性脑卒中二级预防的结局。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 29;14(1):9838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60660-z.
5
Changing or Retaining Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Ischemic Stroke Despite Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment.尽管接受了直接口服抗凝剂治疗,但缺血性中风后改变或保留直接口服抗凝剂
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e032454. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032454. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
6
Selection of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Based on Patient Profile: Perspectives from Vietnamese Experts. Part 1.基于患者资料选择非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动的卒中预防:越南专家观点。第1部分。
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;18:e61. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.24. eCollection 2023.
7
Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulation.尽管进行了口服抗凝治疗,但仍发生房颤和缺血性卒中。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;12(18):5784. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185784.
8
Management and Prognosis of Acute Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动急性卒中的管理与预后
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5752. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175752.
9
Characteristics and Mechanism of Acute Ischemic Stroke in NAVF Patients With Prior Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.伴有抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者急性缺血性脑卒中的特征及机制。
Neurologist. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):379-385. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000504.
10
Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants alone or in combination with anti-platelet therapy.口服抗凝药物单独或联合抗血小板治疗的心房颤动患者的卒中复发风险。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Sep;8(3):722-730. doi: 10.1177/23969873231183211. Epub 2023 Jul 17.