• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现公共卫生法律准备:对公共卫生法的不同看法如何威胁应急准备和应对。

Achieving public health legal preparedness: how dissonant views on public health law threaten emergency preparedness and response.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Sep;33(3):361-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq092. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdq092
PMID:21059686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3159509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective management of modern public health emergencies requires the coordinated efforts of multiple agencies representing various disciplines. Organizational culture differences between public health (PH) and emergency management (EM) entities may hinder inter-agency collaboration. We examine how PH and EM differ in their approach to PH law and how such differences affect their collaboration towards PH preparedness.

METHODS

We conducted 144 semi-structured interviews with local and state PH and EM officials between April 2008 and November 2009. Thematic qualitative analysis in ATLAS.ti was used to extract characteristics of each agency's approach to PH legal preparedness.

RESULTS

Two conflicting approaches to the law emerge. The PH approach is characterized by perceived uncertainty regarding legal authority over preparedness planning tasks; expectation for guidance on interpretation of existing laws; and concern about individual and organizational liability. The EM approach reveals perception of broad legal authority; flexible interpretation of existing laws; and ethical concerns over infringement of individual freedoms and privacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct interpretations of preparedness law impede effective collaboration for PH preparedness. Clarification of legal authority mandates, designation within laws of scope of preparedness activities and guidance on interpretation of current federal and state laws are needed.

摘要

背景

有效管理现代公共卫生突发事件需要多个机构的协调努力,这些机构代表着不同的学科。公共卫生(PH)和应急管理(EM)实体之间的组织文化差异可能会阻碍机构间的合作。我们研究了 PH 和 EM 在处理 PH 法律方面的差异,以及这些差异如何影响他们在 PH 准备方面的合作。

方法

我们在 2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 11 月期间对当地和州 PH 和 EM 官员进行了 144 次半结构化访谈。使用 ATLAS.ti 进行主题定性分析,以提取每个机构对 PH 法律准备情况的方法的特征。

结果

出现了两种相互冲突的法律方法。PH 方法的特点是对准备规划任务的法律权限存在不确定性;对现有法律解释的指导的期望;以及对个人和组织责任的关注。EM 方法揭示了对广泛法律权限的看法;对现有法律的灵活解释;以及对侵犯个人自由和隐私的道德关注。

结论

对准备法律的不同解释阻碍了 PH 准备的有效合作。需要明确法律授权的要求,在法律中指定准备活动的范围,并就当前联邦和州法律的解释提供指导。

相似文献

1
Achieving public health legal preparedness: how dissonant views on public health law threaten emergency preparedness and response.实现公共卫生法律准备:对公共卫生法的不同看法如何威胁应急准备和应对。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Sep;33(3):361-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq092. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
2
What is public health legal preparedness?什么是公共卫生法律准备?
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Winter;31(4):672-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00134.x.
3
Collaborating with Sovereign Tribal Nations to Legally Prepare for Public Health Emergencies.与主权部落民族合作,依法为公共卫生突发事件做准备。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2_suppl):55-58. doi: 10.1177/1073110519857318.
4
Preparedness on the frontline: what's law got to do with it?前线的准备工作:法律在其中起到了什么作用?
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3 Suppl):184-8.
5
Funding Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States.美国公共卫生应急准备的资金投入
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S148-S152. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303956.
6
The role of law in public health preparedness: opportunities and challenges.法律在公共卫生应急准备中的作用:机遇与挑战。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2012 Apr;37(2):297-328. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1538629. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
7
Facilitators and Barriers for Effective Academic-Community Collaboration for Disaster Preparedness and Response.有效开展学术机构与社区合作以进行灾害防范与应对的促进因素和障碍
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):E20-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182205087.
8
The evolution of law in biopreparedness.生物防范领域法律的演变
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Mar;10(1):38-48. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0094.
9
Assessing laws and legal authorities for public health emergency legal preparedness.评估用于公共卫生应急法律准备的法律和法律权威机构。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Spring;36(1 Suppl):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00256.x.
10
Emergency legal preparedness among select US local governments.美国部分地方政府的紧急法律准备情况。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S176-84. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be6e92.

引用本文的文献

1
Trump's second presidency begins: evaluating effects on the US health system.特朗普的第二个总统任期开始:评估对美国医疗系统的影响。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 4;48:101173. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101173. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Promoting public health legal preparedness for emergencies: review of current trends and their relevance in light of the Ebola crisis.促进公共卫生应急法律准备:根据埃博拉危机审视当前趋势及其相关性
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 7;8:28871. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28871. eCollection 2015.
3
Effectiveness of Mechanisms and Models of Coordination between Organizations, Agencies and Bodies Providing or Financing Health Services in Humanitarian Crises: A Systematic Review.人道主义危机中提供或资助卫生服务的组织、机构和团体之间协调机制与模式的有效性:一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137159. eCollection 2015.
4
Translating legal research on mental and behavioral health during emergencies for the public health workforce.翻译突发公共卫生事件中的精神和行为健康相关法律研究,供公共卫生人员使用。
Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):123-8. doi: 10.1177/00333549141296S416.
5
Engagement and education: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.参与和教育:大流行和灾难期间危重症及受伤患者的护理:CHEST共识声明
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e118S-33S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0740.
6
Willingness of the local health department workforce to respond to infectious disease events: empirical, ethical, and legal considerations.当地卫生部门工作人员应对传染病事件的意愿:实证、伦理和法律考量
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Jul-Aug;12(4):178-85. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0009. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
Evidence-based support for the all-hazards approach to emergency preparedness.为应急准备的全灾害方法提供循证支持。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Oct 25;1(1):40. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-40.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency legal preparedness among select US local governments.美国部分地方政府的紧急法律准备情况。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S176-84. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be6e92.
2
Building bridges between medical care and public health.搭建医疗保健与公共卫生之间的桥梁。
JAMA. 2009 Jul 1;302(1):84-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.959.
3
Pandemic influenza preparedness: bridging public health academia and practice.大流行性流感防范:弥合公共卫生学术界与实践之间的差距
Public Health Rep. 2009 Mar-Apr;124(2):344-9. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400226.
4
Core dimensions of connectivity in public health collaboratives.公共卫生合作中连通性的核心维度。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):E1-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000333889.60517.46.
5
Improving cross-sectoral and cross-jurisdictional coordination for public health emergency legal preparedness.加强跨部门和跨辖区协调,做好公共卫生应急法律准备。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Spring;36(1 Suppl):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00262.x.
6
Assessing information and best practices for public health emergency legal preparedness.评估公共卫生应急法律准备的信息和最佳实践。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Spring;36(1 Suppl):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00259.x.
7
Public health legal preparedness: a framework for action.公共卫生法律准备:行动框架
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Spring;36(1 Suppl):13-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00254.x.
8
Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness.公共卫生应急准备的概念化与定义。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114496. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
9
A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States.美国公共卫生应急准备项目的基于州的分析。
Public Health Rep. 2006 Nov-Dec;121(6):737-45. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100614.
10
Local and state collaboration for effective preparedness planning.地方与州政府为制定有效的应急准备计划而开展合作。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):344-51. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200309000-00003.