Greer Scott L, Jarman Holly, Kulikoff Rachel, Yaver Miranda
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 4;48:101173. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101173. eCollection 2025 Aug.
The first hundred days of the second Trump administration was unprecedented, with the administration taking remarkably aggressive, often questionably legal actions across health policy. This article uses the Health Systems Performance Assessment Framework to identify key policies regarding resources, financing, governance, and service delivery and their impact on the cost, quality, access, and equity of the US health system. The evaluation is largely negative. The administration, in its very energetic first hundred days, has already undermined resources, financing, and in particular governance in areas as diverse as oversight of long-term care, scientific research, and vaccination policy. Administration rhetoric and budget proposals called for severe reductions in health care access and actions to terminate services for particular groups, such as immigrants or gender minorities. Many of the particular actions, such as mass layoffs of specialist scientific and regulatory staff, will be difficult to reverse.
特朗普政府第二届任期的头一百天可谓史无前例,政府在卫生政策领域采取了极为激进且往往合法性存疑的行动。本文运用卫生系统绩效评估框架,来确定有关资源、融资、治理和服务提供的关键政策,以及这些政策对美国卫生系统的成本、质量、可及性和公平性的影响。评估结果大多是否定的。在精力充沛的头一百天里,政府已经在诸如长期护理监管、科学研究和疫苗接种政策等诸多领域削弱了资源、融资,尤其是治理。政府的言辞和预算提案呼吁大幅减少医疗保健可及性,并采取行动终止为特定群体(如移民或性少数群体)提供服务。许多具体行动,比如大规模裁员专业科研和监管人员,将难以扭转。