Université de Toulouse (UPS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Toulouse, France.
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 27;5(10):e15000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015000.
Deterrent substances produced by plants are relevant due to their potential toxicity. The fact that most of these substances have an unpalatable taste for humans and other mammals contrasts with the fact that honeybees do not reject them in the range of concentrations in which these compounds are present in flower nectars. Here we asked whether honeybees detect and ingest deterrent substances and whether these substances are really toxic to them.
We show that pairing aversive substances with an odor retards learning of this odor when it is subsequently paired with sucrose. Harnessed honeybees in the laboratory ingest without reluctance a considerable volume (20 µl) of various aversive substances, even if some of them induce significant post-ingestional mortality. These substances do not seem, therefore, to be unpalatable to harnessed bees but induce a malaise-like state that in some cases results in death. Consistently with this finding, bees learning that one odor is associated with sugar, and experiencing in a subsequent phase that the sugar was paired with 20 µl of an aversive substance (devaluation phase), respond less than control bees to the odor and the sugar. Such stimulus devaluation can be accounted for by the malaise-like state induced by the aversive substances.
Our results indicate that substances that taste bitter to humans as well as concentrated saline solutions base their aversive effect on the physiological consequences that their ingestion generates in harnessed bees rather than on an unpalatable taste. This conclusion is only valid for harnessed bees in the laboratory as freely-moving bees might react differently to aversive compounds could actively reject aversive substances. Our results open a new possibility to study conditioned taste aversion based on post-ingestional malaise and thus broaden the spectrum of aversive learning protocols available in honeybees.
植物产生的驱避物质因其潜在毒性而备受关注。大多数这些物质对人类和其他哺乳动物来说味道不佳,但与此同时,蜜蜂在花蜜中这些化合物存在的浓度范围内并不排斥它们。在这里,我们想知道蜜蜂是否能检测到并摄入驱避物质,以及这些物质对它们是否真的有毒。
我们发现,将厌恶物质与气味配对会减缓当它随后与蔗糖配对时的学习速度。在实验室中,经过驯化的蜜蜂毫不勉强地摄入相当大体积(20 µl)的各种厌恶物质,即使其中一些会导致明显的摄入后死亡率。因此,这些物质似乎对驯化的蜜蜂并不难吃,但会引起类似不适的状态,在某些情况下会导致死亡。与这一发现一致的是,蜜蜂学习到一种气味与糖有关,然后在后续阶段体验到糖与 20 µl 的厌恶物质配对(贬值阶段),它们对气味和糖的反应不如对照组蜜蜂强烈。这种刺激贬值可以用厌恶物质引起的类似不适的状态来解释。
我们的结果表明,对人类来说味道苦的物质以及浓缩盐水的驱避作用是基于它们在驯化蜜蜂体内产生的生理后果,而不是基于难吃的味道。这一结论仅适用于实验室中经过驯化的蜜蜂,因为自由移动的蜜蜂可能会对驱避化合物有不同的反应,它们可能会主动拒绝驱避物质。我们的结果为基于摄入后不适的条件味觉厌恶开辟了一个新的可能性,从而拓宽了在蜜蜂中可用的厌恶学习方案的范围。