• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“便利”样本对估计小群体中的免疫接种覆盖率有用吗?

Is a 'convenience' sample useful for estimating immunization coverage in a small population?

作者信息

Weir Jean E, Jones Carrie

机构信息

SIL Clinic, Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea.

出版信息

P N G Med J. 2008 Sep-Dec;51(3-4):155-9.

PMID:21061947
Abstract

Rapid survey methodologies are widely used for assessing immunization coverage in developing countries, approximating true stratified random sampling. Non-random ('convenience') sampling is not considered appropriate for estimating immunization coverage rates but has the advantages of low cost and expediency. We assessed the validity of a convenience sample of children presenting to a travelling clinic by comparing the coverage rate in the convenience sample to the true coverage established by surveying each child in three villages in rural Papua New Guinea. The rate of DTF immunization coverage as estimated by the convenience sample was within 10% of the true coverage when the proportion of children in the sample was two-thirds or when only children over the age of one year were counted, but differed by 11% when the sample included only 53% of the children and when all eligible children were included. The convenience sample may be sufficiently accurate for reporting purposes and is useful for identifying areas of low coverage.

摘要

快速调查方法在发展中国家被广泛用于评估免疫接种覆盖率,近似于真正的分层随机抽样。非随机(“便利”)抽样被认为不适用于估计免疫接种覆盖率,但具有成本低和便捷的优点。我们通过将前往流动诊所的儿童便利样本中的覆盖率与在巴布亚新几内亚农村三个村庄对每个儿童进行调查所确定的真实覆盖率进行比较,评估了该便利样本的有效性。当样本中儿童比例为三分之二或仅统计一岁以上儿童时,便利样本估计的三联疫苗(DTF)免疫接种覆盖率与真实覆盖率相差在10%以内,但当样本仅包括53%的儿童以及包括所有符合条件的儿童时,两者相差11%。该便利样本对于报告目的而言可能足够准确,并且有助于识别低覆盖率地区。

相似文献

1
Is a 'convenience' sample useful for estimating immunization coverage in a small population?“便利”样本对估计小群体中的免疫接种覆盖率有用吗?
P N G Med J. 2008 Sep-Dec;51(3-4):155-9.
2
Evaluation of immunization coverage by lot quality assurance sampling compared with 30-cluster sampling in a primary health centre in India.在印度一家初级卫生中心,采用批量质量保证抽样法与30群组抽样法对免疫接种覆盖率进行评估。
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(3):269-74.
3
Estimating vaccination coverage: routine information or sample survey?估算疫苗接种覆盖率:常规信息还是抽样调查?
J Trop Med Hyg. 1988 Feb;91(1):35-42.
4
Immunization status and risk factors of migrant children in densely populated areas of Beijing, China.中国北京人口密集地区流动儿童的免疫状况及危险因素。
Vaccine. 2010 Feb 3;28(5):1264-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.015. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
5
Immunisation and infant mortality in Pakistan.巴基斯坦的免疫接种与婴儿死亡率
Pak Dev Rev. 1993 Winter;32(4 Pt 2):1117-23.
6
Vaccination coverage in Northern Province, Papua New Guinea.巴布亚新几内亚北部省份的疫苗接种覆盖率。
P N G Med J. 1983 Jun;26(2):99-101.
7
Control of pertussis in the world.全球百日咳的防控
World Health Stat Q. 1992;45(2-3):238-47.
8
Evaluation of immunization coverage at local level.地方层面免疫接种覆盖率评估。
World Health Forum. 1993;14(3):275-81.
9
Measles epidemiology and outbreak response immunization in a rural community in Peru.秘鲁一个农村社区的麻疹流行病学及疫情应对免疫情况
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(7):545-52.
10
Factors affecting the use of immunization among urban settlement dwellers in Papua New Guinea.影响巴布亚新几内亚城市定居居民免疫接种使用情况的因素。
P N G Med J. 1992 Sep;35(3):179-85.