• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲范围内参与医疗决策:一项国际纵向多中心研究。

Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study.

作者信息

Bär Deucher A, Hengartner M P, Kawohl W, Konrad J, Puschner B, Clarke E, Slade M, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Égerházi A, Süveges Á, Krogsgaard Bording M, Munk-Jørgensen P, Rössler W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, PO Box 1930, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Pfingstweidstrasse 96, PO Box 707, 8037 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2016 May;35:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.02.001
PMID:27061376
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this paper was to examine national differences in the desire to participate in decision-making of people with severe mental illness in six European countries.

METHODS

The data was taken from a European longitudinal observational study (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675). A sample of 514 patients with severe mental illness from the study centers in Ulm, Germany, London, England, Naples, Italy, Debrecen, Hungary, Aalborg, Denmark and Zurich, Switzerland were assessed as to desire to participate in medical decision-making. Associations between desire for participation in decision-making and center location were analyzed with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

We found large cross-national differences in patients' desire to participate in decision-making, with the center explaining 47.2% of total variance in the desire for participation (P<0.001). Averaged over time and independent of patient characteristics, London (mean=2.27), Ulm (mean=2.13) and Zurich (mean=2.14) showed significantly higher scores in desire for participation, followed by Aalborg (mean=1.97), where scores were in turn significantly higher than in Debrecen (mean=1.56). The lowest scores were reported in Naples (mean=1.14). Over time, the desire for participation in decision-making increased significantly in Zurich (b=0.23) and decreased in Naples (b=-0.14). In all other centers, values remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that patients' desire for participation in decision-making varies by location. We suggest that more research attention be focused on identifying specific cultural and social factors in each country to further explain observed differences across Europe.

摘要

背景

本文旨在研究六个欧洲国家中重症精神疾病患者参与决策意愿的国家差异。

方法

数据取自一项欧洲纵向观察性研究(CEDAR;ISRCTN75841675)。对来自德国乌尔姆、英国伦敦、意大利那不勒斯、匈牙利德布勒森、丹麦奥尔堡和瑞士苏黎世研究中心的514例重症精神疾病患者参与医疗决策的意愿进行了评估。采用广义估计方程分析参与决策意愿与中心所在地之间的关联。

结果

我们发现患者参与决策的意愿存在很大的跨国差异,中心因素解释了参与意愿总方差的47.2%(P<0.001)。平均来看,且不考虑患者特征,伦敦(均值=2.27)、乌尔姆(均值=2.13)和苏黎世(均值=2.14)的参与意愿得分显著更高,其次是奥尔堡(均值=1.97),其得分又显著高于德布勒森(均值=1.56)。那不勒斯的得分最低(均值=1.14)。随着时间推移,苏黎世参与决策的意愿显著增加(b=0.23),而那不勒斯则下降(b=-0.14)。在所有其他中心,数值保持稳定。

结论

本研究表明患者参与决策的意愿因地点而异。我们建议更多的研究关注识别每个国家的特定文化和社会因素,以进一步解释在欧洲观察到的差异。

相似文献

1
Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study.欧洲范围内参与医疗决策:一项国际纵向多中心研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 May;35:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
2
Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR).欧洲严重精神疾病患者常规护理中的临床决策和结果(CEDAR)。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Feb;25(1):69-79. doi: 10.1017/S204579601400078X. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.临床决策和严重精神疾病患者常规护理的结局(CEDAR):研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 10;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90.
4
Desire for information of people with severe mental illness.重度精神疾病患者对信息的需求。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):1883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0901-5. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
5
Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS).开发和心理计量特性的五语言多角度工具评估临床决策风格在治疗严重精神疾病患者 (CDMS)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 4;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-48.
6
Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study.参与临床决策和满意度对精神卫生实践结果的影响:CEDAR 欧洲纵向研究的结果。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(7-8):848-860. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Impoverished diabetic patients whose doctors facilitate their participation in medical decision making are more satisfied with their care.医生帮助贫困糖尿病患者参与医疗决策,这些患者对医疗服务更满意。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Nov;17(11):857-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20120.x.
8
Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.六个国家严重精神疾病患者的康复及决策参与情况:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1207-4.
9
Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice.一项关于常规临床实践的跨国研究中的赋权与满意度
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):369-78. doi: 10.1111/acps.12365. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
10
Clinical Decision Making and Mental Health Service Use Among Persons With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe.欧洲严重精神疾病患者的临床决策制定和精神卫生服务利用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):970-974. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600114. Epub 2017 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characterization and management of persons with comorbid epilepsy and depression: an expert opinion paper.癫痫与抑郁症共病患者的临床特征与管理:一篇专家意见论文。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1592650. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1592650. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of the First Episode Digital Monitoring mHealth Intervention for People With Early Psychosis: Qualitative Interview Study With Clinicians.首发精神病患者数字监测移动健康干预措施的开发:针对临床医生的定性访谈研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Nov 4;9(11):e41482. doi: 10.2196/41482.
3
Physicians' and Patients' Interruptions in Clinical Practice: A Quantitative Analysis.
医生和患者在临床实践中的打断:一项定量分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):423-429. doi: 10.1370/afm.2846.
4
Mental health service users' responses to anticipated discrimination and the Time to Change program in England.精神卫生服务使用者对预期歧视及英格兰“改变时间”项目的反应。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 21;64(1):e5. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.114.
5
The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review.共同决策在提高精神分裂症患者药物治疗依从性中的作用:一项临床综述
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 5;19:43. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00293-4. eCollection 2020.
6
Patients' experiences of the caring encounter with the psychiatric emergency response team in the emergency medical service-A qualitative interview study.患者对紧急医疗服务中精神科应急反应团队的护理体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):442-449. doi: 10.1111/hex.13024. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Perceived Coercion Among Patients Admitted in Psychiatric Wards: Italian Results of the EUNOMIA Study.精神病病房住院患者的感知强制:EUNOMIA研究的意大利结果。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 21;10:316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00316. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of a Strategic Tool for Shared Decision-Making in the Use of Antidepressants among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus Group Study.开发一种用于指导伴有重性抑郁障碍的患者使用抗抑郁药的共享决策的策略工具:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):1402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071402.
9
Predicting the preferences for involvement in medical decision making among patients with mental disorders.预测精神障碍患者参与医疗决策的偏好。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0182203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182203. eCollection 2017.
10
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.