Suppr超能文献

上颌牙齿及骨结合式牙种植体的被动触觉敏感性

Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.

作者信息

Grieznis Linards, Apse Peteris, Blumfelds Leons

机构信息

Department of Prosthodotics, Riga Stradins University, 20 Dzirciema Street, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia.

出版信息

Stomatologija. 2010;12(3):80-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare passive tactile sensibility of natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (17 males and 12 females) were included in the study. Natural teeth were subdivided into two groups: non endodontically treated teeth (NETT) and endodontically treated teeth (ETT). A computer-controlled custom-made pressure sensitive device was modified for intraoral use. Pushing forces were applied parallel to the vertical axis of teeth and implants. The patient held a signal button which he/she activated as soon as touch was sensed. At this moment the computer registered passive tactile threshold - measured in Newtons. The mean values of passive tactile sensibility for natural teeth and dental implants were calculated. Comparison of the mean values was performed by the means of t-test.

RESULTS

Passive tactile threshold for osseointegrated dental implants was 2.50 N (SD=1.39), and for teeth - 0.72 N (SD=0.49), for non endodontically treated teeth it was 0.66 N (SD=0.43) and for endodontically treated teeth - 0.96 N (SD=0.87). The differences in mean values were statistically significant (p<0.001) except for mean values of NETT vs. ETT.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that patients with osseointegrated implants subjectively feel "touch" sensation when greater force is applied compared with natural teeth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较上颌天然牙与骨结合式牙种植体的被动触觉敏感性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了29例患者(17例男性和12例女性)。天然牙被分为两组:非根管治疗牙(NETT)和根管治疗牙(ETT)。对一个计算机控制的定制压敏装置进行了改进,以用于口腔内。推力平行于牙齿和种植体的垂直轴施加。患者手持一个信号按钮,一旦感觉到触摸就按下该按钮。此时计算机记录被动触觉阈值——以牛顿为单位测量。计算天然牙和牙种植体的被动触觉敏感性平均值。通过t检验对平均值进行比较。

结果

骨结合式牙种植体的被动触觉阈值为2.50 N(标准差=1.39),牙齿的为0.72 N(标准差=0.49),非根管治疗牙为0.66 N(标准差=0.43),根管治疗牙为0.96 N(标准差=0.87)。除了非根管治疗牙与根管治疗牙的平均值外,平均值的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,与天然牙相比,骨结合式种植体患者在施加更大力量时主观上能感觉到“触摸”感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验