Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D
Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology), Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(5):549-54.
A passive threshold determination was carried out on 31 patients subdivided into four test groups according to different prosthesis types supported by osseointegrated implants. They were compared to a control group of 10 patients with nonrestored natural test teeth. Forces were generated by a solenoid-driven stimulating device, which was placed in contact with the implant or tooth prior to the actual force rise to avoid impact forces. The findings indicate that the threshold level of implants is 50 times higher than that of natural teeth when tapping is avoided, which might otherwise trigger distant receptors. Bone deformation triggering the periosteal mechanoreceptors is the most logical explanation for the sensation reported.
对31例患者进行了被动阈值测定,这些患者根据骨整合种植体支持的不同假体类型分为四个测试组。将他们与10例未修复天然测试牙的患者组成的对照组进行比较。力由螺线管驱动的刺激装置产生,该装置在实际力上升之前与种植体或牙齿接触,以避免冲击力。研究结果表明,在避免敲击的情况下,种植体的阈值水平比天然牙高50倍,否则敲击可能会触发远处的感受器。引发骨膜机械感受器的骨变形是所报告感觉的最合理的解释。