Kelly Aaron S, Steinberger Julia, Jacobs David R, Hong Ching-Ping, Moran Antoinette, Sinaiko Alan R
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e283-9. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2010.528765. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
The value of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in childhood and adolescence and its stability into young adulthood have been questioned. This study compared the MetS in late childhood (mean age 13) versus a cluster score of the MetS components as predictors of young adult (mean age 22) cardiovascular risk.
Anthropometrics, blood pressure, lipid profile, and insulin resistance (insulin clamp) were obtained in 265 individuals at mean ages 13 and 22. The MetS was defined dichotomously by current pediatric and adult criteria. The MetS cluster score used the average of deviates of the MetS components standardized to their means and standard deviations at mean age 13.
The MetS was rarely present at mean age 13 and did not predict MetS at mean age 22 but identified individuals who continued to have adverse levels of risk factors at mean age 22. In contrast to the standard MetS definition, the MetS cluster score tracked strongly and at mean age 22 was significantly higher in the individuals with MetS at mean age 13 (0.78 ± 0.71) than those without MetS at mean age 13 (0.09 ± 0.70, p <0.0001).
Although the MetS at mean age 13, using the conventional definition, is not a reliable method for predicting the MetS at mean age 22, it does predict adverse levels of cardiovascular risk factors. A cluster score, using the MetS components as continuous variables, is more reliable in predicting young adult risk from late childhood.
儿童期和青少年期代谢综合征(MetS)的价值及其在青年期的稳定性受到了质疑。本研究比较了儿童晚期(平均年龄13岁)的MetS与MetS各组分的聚类评分作为青年期(平均年龄22岁)心血管风险预测指标的情况。
对265名平均年龄为13岁和22岁的个体进行了人体测量、血压、血脂谱和胰岛素抵抗(胰岛素钳夹)检测。MetS根据当前儿科和成人标准进行二分法定义。MetS聚类评分采用MetS各组分偏离其在平均年龄13岁时均值和标准差的平均值。
在平均年龄13岁时,MetS很少出现,也不能预测平均年龄22岁时的MetS,但能识别出在平均年龄22岁时仍有不良风险因素水平的个体。与标准的MetS定义不同,MetS聚类评分具有很强的跟踪性,在平均年龄22岁时,平均年龄13岁时患有MetS的个体(0.78±0.71)的MetS聚类评分显著高于平均年龄13岁时未患MetS的个体(0.09±0.70,p<0.0001)。
虽然按照传统定义,平均年龄13岁时的MetS不是预测平均年龄22岁时MetS的可靠方法,但它确实能预测心血管风险因素的不良水平。将MetS各组分作为连续变量的聚类评分在预测儿童晚期至青年期的风险方面更可靠。