School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):88-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.039537. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Fetal surgery has been practised for some decades now. However, it remains a highly complex area, both medically and ethically. This paper shows how the routine use of ultrasound has been a catalyst for fetal surgery, in creating new needs and new incentives for intervention. Some of the needs met by fetal surgery are those of parents and clinicians who experience stress while waiting for the birth of a fetus with known anomalies. The paper suggests that the role of technology and visualisation techniques in creating and meeting such new needs is ethically problematic. It then addresses the idea that fetal surgery should be restricted to interventions that are life-saving for the fetus, arguing that this restriction is unduly paternalistic. Fetal surgery poses challenges for an autonomy-based system of ethics. However, it is risky to circumvent these challenges by restricting the choices open to pregnant women, even when these choices appear excessively altruistic.
胎儿手术已经实践了几十年。然而,它在医学和伦理方面仍然是一个高度复杂的领域。本文展示了常规使用超声技术如何成为胎儿手术的催化剂,为干预创造了新的需求和新的动力。胎儿手术满足的一些需求来自于父母和临床医生,他们在等待患有已知异常的胎儿出生时会感到压力。本文认为,技术和可视化技术在创造和满足这些新需求方面存在伦理问题。然后,本文探讨了胎儿手术应该仅限于对胎儿有救命作用的干预措施的观点,认为这种限制过于家长式。胎儿手术对基于自主的伦理体系提出了挑战。然而,通过限制孕妇的选择来规避这些挑战是有风险的,即使这些选择看起来过于利他。