Department of Infectious Diseases and Sexual Health, Trinity Centre, Bradford, UK;
Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 9;1:59-65. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s4455.
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the commonest cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age. Oral metronidazole has long been established as an effective therapy in the treatment of BV. However, adverse effects due to metronidazole are frequent and this may lead to problems with adherence to a 7-day course of treatment and subsequently result in treatment failure. Oral tinidazole has been used to treat bacterial vaginosis for over 25 years but in a number of different dosage regimens. Placebo controlled trials have consistently shown increases in cure rate with tinidazole. Longer courses of treatment (eg, 1 g daily for 5 days) appear to be more effective than a 2 g oral single dose. Comparative studies suggest that oral tinidazole is equivalent to oral metronidazole, intravaginal clindamycin cream, and intravaginal metronidazole tablets, in efficacy in treating BV. However, tinidazole has a more favorable side effect profile than oral metronidazole notably with better gastrointestinal tolerability and less metallic taste. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with high rates of recurrence and appropriate management of such recurrences can prove difficult. Recurrent BV has been linked with persistence of Gardnerella vaginalis after treatment; however the clinical implications of the possible greater activity of tinidazole against G. vaginalis are not yet clear. Repeated courses of oral metronidazole may be poorly tolerated and an alternative but equally effective treatment that is better tolerated may be preferable. In comparison to oral metronidazole, cost is clearly an issue as oral metronidazole is considerably cheaper and available in generic form. However where avoidance of oral metronidazole is necessary because of side effects, oral tinidazole is a cost-effective alternative.
细菌性阴道病(BV)是育龄妇女阴道分泌物最常见的原因。口服甲硝唑长期以来一直是治疗 BV 的有效方法。然而,由于甲硝唑的不良反应频繁,这可能导致对 7 天疗程的依从性问题,进而导致治疗失败。口服替硝唑已用于治疗细菌性阴道病超过 25 年,但有多种不同的剂量方案。安慰剂对照试验一致表明,替硝唑的治愈率增加。较长疗程(例如,每天 1 g,连用 5 天)似乎比 2 g 口服单剂量更有效。比较研究表明,口服替硝唑在治疗 BV 方面与口服甲硝唑、阴道内克林霉素乳膏和阴道内甲硝唑片剂等效。然而,替硝唑的副作用谱比口服甲硝唑更有利,特别是胃肠道耐受性更好,金属味更少。细菌性阴道病的复发率很高,适当处理这些复发可能很困难。复发性 BV 与治疗后阴道加德纳菌的持续存在有关;然而,替硝唑对阴道加德纳菌可能具有更大活性的临床意义尚不清楚。反复口服甲硝唑可能耐受性差,替代但同样有效的治疗方法更好耐受可能是优选的。与口服甲硝唑相比,成本显然是一个问题,因为口服甲硝唑便宜得多,并且有通用形式。然而,如果由于副作用需要避免使用口服甲硝唑,口服替硝唑是一种具有成本效益的替代方案。