Suppr超能文献

使用来自动物接种的刚地弓形虫速殖子进行的萨宾-费尔德曼染色试验仍是检测弓形虫抗体的最佳方法吗?

Is Sabin-Feldman dye test using T. gondii tachyzoites from animal inoculation still the best method for detecting Toxoplasma gondii antibodies?

作者信息

Udonsom Ruenruetai, Buddhirongawatr Ruangrat, Sukthana Yaowalark

机构信息

Department of Protozoology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010 Sep;41(5):1059-64.

Abstract

Although the Sabin-Feldman dye test is the gold standard for detecting Toxoplasma antibodies in human, it is performed only in reference laboratories because live virulent T. gondii are used for the test. We collected 210 human serum samples and tested them by the dye test using in vivo tachyzoites (conventional method) then compared these results with three other methods: a dye test using cell culture-derived T. gondii tachyzoites and indirect immunofluorescent antibody tests (IFAT) using in vivo and in vitro tachyzoites. We found the conventional dye test detected the highest percent of cases (4.3%), followed by the IFAT using parasites from mice (3.8%), then the dye test and the IFAT using cell culture tachyzoites (both 2.8%). Agreement with the dye test when using mouse and cell culture derived tachyzoites was 96.7%. Using in vivo tachyzoites for the dye test and the IFAT gave 94.3% agreement, while using in vitro tachyzoites gave 94.8% agreement. When compared with the conventional dye test, the IFAT had 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The T. gondii tachyzoites obtained from cell culture had a lower virulence, as indicated by a three times longer survival period in the inoculated mice. We favor the conventional dye test as the gold standard for Toxoplasma antibody detection. In vitro tachyzoites can be used routinely in the dye test but false negative results may occur in some cases. The IFAT, using either in vivo or in vitro tachyzoites, are alternatives for laboratories where provision of live tachyzoites is limited.

摘要

虽然Sabin-Feldman染色试验是检测人体弓形虫抗体的金标准,但由于该试验使用活的强毒弓形虫,因此仅在参考实验室进行。我们收集了210份人血清样本,使用体内速殖子通过染色试验进行检测(传统方法),然后将这些结果与其他三种方法进行比较:使用细胞培养来源的弓形虫速殖子的染色试验以及使用体内和体外速殖子的间接免疫荧光抗体试验(IFAT)。我们发现传统染色试验检测出的病例百分比最高(4.3%),其次是使用来自小鼠的寄生虫的IFAT(3.8%),然后是使用细胞培养速殖子的染色试验和IFAT(均为2.8%)。使用小鼠和细胞培养来源的速殖子进行IFAT时与染色试验的一致性为96.7%。使用体内速殖子进行染色试验和IFAT的一致性为94.3%,而使用体外速殖子的一致性为94.8%。与传统染色试验相比,IFAT的敏感性为75%,特异性为100%。从细胞培养中获得的弓形虫速殖子毒力较低,接种小鼠后的存活期延长了三倍即表明了这一点。我们赞成将传统染色试验作为弓形虫抗体检测的金标准。体外速殖子可常规用于染色试验,但在某些情况下可能会出现假阴性结果。对于提供活速殖子受限的实验室,使用体内或体外速殖子的IFAT是替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验