Suppr超能文献

光度测定法是评估猪精液浓度的一种准确、可靠的方法吗?

Is photometry an accurate and reliable method to assess boar semen concentration?

机构信息

IMV Technologies ZI n°1 Est 61300 Aigle, France.

出版信息

Theriogenology. 2011 Feb;75(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

Abstract

Sperm concentration assessment is a key point to insure appropriate sperm number per dose in species subjected to artificial insemination (AI). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of two commercially available photometers, AccuCell™ and AccuRead™ pre-calibrated for boar semen in comparison to UltiMate™ boar version 12.3D, NucleoCounter SP100 and Thoma hemacytometer. For each type of instrument, concentration was measured on 34 boar semen samples in quadruplicate and agreement between measurements and instruments were evaluated. Accuracy for both photometers was illustrated by mean of percentage differences to the general mean. It was -0.6% and 0.5% for Accucell™ and Accuread™ respectively, no significant differences were found between instrument and mean of measurement among all equipment. Repeatability for both photometers was 1.8% and 3.2% for AccuCell™ and AccuRead™ respectively. Low differences were observed between instruments (confidence interval 3%) except when hemacytometer was used as a reference. Even though hemacytometer is considered worldwide as the gold standard, it is the more variable instrument (confidence interval 7.1%). The conclusion is that routine photometry measures of raw semen concentration are reliable, accurate and precise using AccuRead™ or AccuCell™. There are multiple steps in semen processing that can induce sperm loss and therefore increase differences between theoretical and real sperm numbers in doses. Potential biases that depend on the workflow but not on the initial photometric measure of semen concentration are discussed.

摘要

精子浓度评估是确保人工授精(AI)物种每剂精子数量适当的关键点。本研究的目的是评估两种市售光度计 AccuCell™ 和 AccuRead™(已针对猪精液进行预校准)与 UltiMate™ 猪版 12.3D、NucleoCounter SP100 和 Thoma 血细胞计数器的准确性和可靠性。对于每种仪器,在 34 个猪精液样本中重复测量 4 次,并评估测量值与仪器之间的一致性。通过与总体平均值的百分比差异来表示两种光度计的准确性。Accucell™ 和 AccuRead™ 的平均值分别为-0.6%和 0.5%,所有设备中仪器与测量平均值之间没有发现显著差异。两种光度计的重复性分别为 AccuCell™ 的 1.8%和 AccuRead™ 的 3.2%。除了使用血细胞计数器作为参考时,仪器之间观察到的差异很小(置信区间为 3%)。尽管血细胞计数器被认为是全球范围内的金标准,但它是最具变异性的仪器(置信区间为 7.1%)。结论是,使用 AccuRead™ 或 AccuCell™,可以对原始精液浓度进行可靠、准确和精确的常规光度计测量。在精液处理过程中有多个步骤可能导致精子丢失,因此增加了剂量中理论和实际精子数量之间的差异。讨论了取决于工作流程但不取决于精液浓度初始光度计测量的潜在偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验