Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Dec 15;409(2):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.037. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
More than half the world's population use biomass fuels as a household energy source and, hence, face significant exposure to a number of air pollutants. In Pakistan about 90% of rural households and 22% of urban households use biomass fuels. In order to assess the levels of NO(2) in the residential micro-environment, two sampling campaigns were carried out at different times of the year (summer and winter) at an urban and two rural sites during 2005 and 2007. Rural site I used biomass fuels while natural gas was utilized at rural site II and the urban site. In winter NO(2) concentrations at all three sites were higher in the kitchens than living rooms and outdoors. ANOVA showed that, although, there was a significant difference among NO(2) concentrations in the kitchens, living rooms and courtyards, at all the three sites, there was no significant different between kitchens using biomass fuels and natural gas. During the summer NO(2) levels fell sharply at both rural sites (from 256 μg/m(3) and 242 μg/m(3) to 51 μg/m(3) and 81 μg/m(3)). However at the urban site the mean levels were slightly higher in summer (234 μg/m(3)) than in winter (218 μg/m(3)). The considerable seasonal variation at the rural sites was due to a shift of indoor kitchens to open outdoor kitchens at rural site I and more ventilation at rural site II during summer. There was no significant difference between kitchens using biomass (site I) or natural gas (site II), however the kitchens at rural site II and urban site showed a significant difference. Overall fuel selection showed no significant effect on NO(2) levels. However the NO(2) concentrations may pose a significant threat to the health of people, especially women and children.
世界上超过一半的人口将生物质燃料用作家庭能源,因此,他们面临着许多空气污染物的大量暴露。在巴基斯坦,大约 90%的农村家庭和 22%的城市家庭使用生物质燃料。为了评估住宅微环境中 NO₂的水平,在 2005 年和 2007 年,在不同的季节(夏季和冬季),在一个城市和两个农村地区进行了两次采样活动。农村地区 I 使用生物质燃料,而农村地区 II 和城市地区则使用天然气。在冬季,所有三个地点的厨房中 NO₂浓度均高于客厅和室外。ANOVA 表明,尽管三个地点的厨房、客厅和庭院中的 NO₂浓度存在显著差异,但使用生物质燃料和天然气的厨房之间没有显著差异。在夏季,两个农村地区的 NO₂水平急剧下降(从 256μg/m³和 242μg/m³降至 51μg/m³和 81μg/m³)。然而,在城市地区,夏季的平均水平略高于冬季(234μg/m³比 218μg/m³)。农村地区的季节性变化很大,是由于农村地区 I 的室内厨房转移到了户外开放式厨房,以及农村地区 II 在夏季的通风量增加。使用生物质燃料(地区 I)或天然气(地区 II)的厨房之间没有显著差异,但是农村地区 II 和城市地区的厨房之间存在显著差异。总体燃料选择对 NO₂水平没有显著影响。然而,NO₂浓度可能对人们的健康构成重大威胁,尤其是妇女和儿童。