• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刚体配准中一阶误差预测的一般方法。

General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Mar;30(3):679-93. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2091513. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1109/TMI.2010.2091513
PMID:21075718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4607070/
Abstract

A general approach to the first-order analysis of error in rigid point registration is presented that accommodates fiducial localization error (FLE) that may be inhomogeneous (varying from point to point) and anisotropic (varying with direction) and also accommodates arbitrary weighting that may also be inhomogeneous and anisotropic. Covariances are derived for target registration error (TRE) and for weighted fiducial registration error (FRE) in terms of covariances of FLE, culminating in a simple implementation that encompasses all combinations of weightings and anisotropy. Furthermore, it is shown that for ideal weighting, in which the weighting matrix for each fiducial equals the inverse of the square root of the cross covariance of its two-space FLE, fluctuations of FRE and TRE are mutually independent. These results are validated by comparison with previously published expressions and by simulation. Furthermore, simulations for randomly generated fiducial positions and FLEs are presented that show that correlation is negligible (correlation coefficient < 0.1) in the exact case for both ideal and uniform weighting (i.e., no weighting), the latter of which is employed in commercial surgical guidance systems. From these results we conclude that for these weighting schemes, while valid expressions exist relating the covariance of FRE to the covariance of TRE, there are no measures of the goodness of fit of the fiducials for a given registration that give to first order any information about the fluctuation of TRE from its expected value and none that give useful information in the exact case. Therefore, as estimators of registration accuracy, such measures should be approached with extreme caution both by the purveyors of guidance systems and by the practitioners who use them.

摘要

提出了一种刚性点配准中误差的一阶分析的通用方法,该方法可以容纳可能不均匀(随点变化)和各向异性(随方向变化)的基准定位误差(FLE),并且还可以容纳可能不均匀和各向异性的任意加权。根据 FLE 的协方差,推导出目标配准误差(TRE)和加权基准配准误差(FRE)的协方差,最终得到一个简单的实现,包含了所有加权和各向异性的组合。此外,还表明对于理想加权,其中每个基准的加权矩阵等于其两个空间 FLE 的交叉协方差的平方根的倒数,FRE 和 TRE 的波动是相互独立的。这些结果通过与先前发表的表达式和模拟进行比较得到验证。此外,还提出了针对随机生成的基准位置和 FLE 的模拟结果,表明在理想和均匀加权(即无加权)的精确情况下,相关性可以忽略不计(相关系数 < 0.1),后者在商业手术引导系统中使用。从这些结果中我们得出结论,对于这些加权方案,虽然存在将 FRE 的协方差与 TRE 的协方差相关联的有效表达式,但对于给定的配准,没有任何衡量基准拟合度的指标可以首先提供关于 TRE 从其期望值的波动的任何信息,也没有任何指标可以在精确情况下提供有用的信息。因此,作为配准精度的估计量,这些措施都应该由引导系统的供应商和使用它们的从业者谨慎对待。

相似文献

1
General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration.刚体配准中一阶误差预测的一般方法。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Mar;30(3):679-93. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2091513. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
2
Rigid-body point-based registration: The distribution of the target registration error when the fiducial registration errors are given.刚体点配准:当基准配准误差已知时的目标配准误差分布。
Med Image Anal. 2011 Aug;15(4):397-413. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
Improved statistical TRE model when using a reference frame.使用参考系时改进的统计TRE模型。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 1):442-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_54.
4
On fiducial target registration error in the presence of anisotropic noise.存在各向异性噪声时的基准目标配准误差
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 2):628-35. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_76.
5
Analytic expressions for fiducial and surface target registration error.基准和表面目标配准误差的解析表达式。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):637-44. doi: 10.1007/11866763_78.
6
A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error.一种用于基于点的目标配准误差与各向异性基准定位误差的统计模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Mar;27(3):378-90. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908124.
7
Real-time estimation of FLE statistics for 3-D tracking with point-based registration.基于点配准的三维跟踪中FLE统计量的实时估计。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Sep;28(9):1384-98. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2016336. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
8
A theoretical comparison of different target registration error estimators.不同目标配准误差估计器的理论比较。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):1032-40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85990-1_124.
9
Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.用于图像引导放射治疗的PET与CT配准的体模验证
Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):1083-92. doi: 10.1118/1.1688041.
10
A high-order solution for the distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.刚体点基配准中目标配准误差分布的高阶解。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):603-11. doi: 10.1007/11866763_74.

引用本文的文献

1
SPIE Medical Imaging 50th anniversary: historical review of the Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling conference.国际光学工程学会医学成像50周年:图像引导手术、机器人干预与建模会议的历史回顾。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Feb;9(Suppl 1):012206. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.S1.012206. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Anatomical variability, multi-modal coordinate systems, and precision targeting in the marmoset brain.狨猴脑的解剖学变异性、多模态坐标系和精确靶向。
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 15;250:118965. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118965. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Are fiducial registration error and target registration error correlated? SciKit-SurgeryFRED for teaching and research.

本文引用的文献

1
Distribution of fiducial registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.刚体配准中基准点配准误差的分布。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Nov;28(11):1791-801. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2024208.
2
Distribution of target registration error for anisotropic and inhomogeneous fiducial localization error.各向异性和非均匀基准定位误差的目标配准误差分布。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jun;28(6):799-813. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2020751. Epub 2009 May 5.
3
A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error.
基准配准误差与目标配准误差相关吗?用于教学和研究的SciKit-SurgeryFRED。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2021 Feb 15;11598. doi: 10.1117/12.2580159.
4
Novel microscope-based visual display and nasopharyngeal registration for auditory brainstem implantation: a feasibility study in an ex vivo model.基于显微镜的新型视觉显示和鼻咽部配准在人工耳蜗植入中的应用:在离体模型中的可行性研究。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Feb;17(2):261-270. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02514-x. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
A new 2D-3D registration gold-standard dataset for the hip joint based on uncertainty modeling.基于不确定性建模的髋关节新型 2D-3D 配准金标准数据集。
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):5991-6006. doi: 10.1002/mp.15124. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Visual display for surgical targeting: concepts and usability study.手术靶向的可视化显示:概念与可用性研究。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Sep;16(9):1565-1576. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02355-8. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
7
Strain Energy Decay Predicts Elastic Registration Accuracy From Intraoperative Data Constraints.应变能衰减可根据术中数据约束预测弹性配准精度。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Apr;40(4):1290-1302. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3052523. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Combining Sparse and Dense Features to Improve Multi-Modal Registration for Brain DTI Images.结合稀疏和密集特征以改进脑扩散张量成像(DTI)图像的多模态配准
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Nov 14;22(11):1299. doi: 10.3390/e22111299.
9
The deformable most-likely-point paradigm.可变形最可能点范式。
Med Image Anal. 2019 Jul;55:148-164. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Increasing Safety of a Robotic System for Inner Ear Surgery Using Probabilistic Error Modeling Near Vital Anatomy.使用重要解剖结构附近的概率误差建模提高内耳手术机器人系统的安全性。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2016;9786. doi: 10.1117/12.2214984. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
一种用于基于点的目标配准误差与各向异性基准定位误差的统计模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Mar;27(3):378-90. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908124.
4
Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods.无框架图像引导神经外科手术中的应用准确性:三种患者与图像配准方法的比较研究
J Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;106(6):1012-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1012.
5
Neuronavigation without rigid pin fixation of the head in left frontotemporal tumor surgery with intraoperative speech mapping.在左额颞叶肿瘤手术中进行术中言语图谱绘制时,不使用头部刚性针固定的神经导航。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4 Suppl 2):330-8; discussion 338. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255378.80216.52.
6
Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery.设计用于图像引导手术的光学跟踪仪器。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 May;23(5):533-45. doi: 10.1109/tmi.2004.825614.
7
Factors influencing the application accuracy of neuronavigation systems.影响神经导航系统应用准确性的因素。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2000;75(4):188-202. doi: 10.1159/000048404.
8
The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.基于刚体点的配准中目标配准误差的分布。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Sep;20(9):917-27. doi: 10.1109/42.952729.
9
Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.预测基于刚体点的配准中的误差。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Oct;17(5):694-702. doi: 10.1109/42.736021.