Suppr超能文献

噻嗪类、血管扩张剂和利血平联合用药与甲基多巴加氢氯噻嗪治疗津巴布韦高血压的比较。

Combination of a thiazide, a vasodilator and reserpine compared with methyldopa plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension in Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Stein C M, Neill P, Mwaluko G M, Kusema T

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1990 Mar 3;77(5):243-5.

PMID:2107581
Abstract

Brinerdin (Sandoz), a combination of a diuretic (clopamide 5 mg), a vasodilator (dihydro-ergocristine 0.5 mg) and reserpine (0.1 mg) (CDR) was compared with methyldopa (MD) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) for antihypertensive effect, adverse reactions, compliance and patient preference in an open cross-over trial. Eighteen patients completed both arms of the trial and 5 patients who completed the CDR arm were withdrawn while on the MD arm because of adverse effects in 4 and poor control in 1. On HCT 50 mg daily the mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 163.9 +/- 16.3 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure was 105.9 +/- 6.7 mmHg. On CDR these were reduced to systolic blood pressure 140.3 +/- 15.1 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 87.8 +/- 9.3 mmHg. On MD + HCT the systolic blood pressure was reduced to 138.5 +/- 16.9 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure to 88.9 +/- 10.3 mmHg. The differences between the two treatment periods in systolic blood pressure (1.8 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 4.1 + 7.7 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (1.1 mmHg; 95% CI - 4.6 + 2.4 mmHg) were not significant with P values of 0.6 and 0.7 respectively. Compliance was 98.2% for CDR and 94.7% for MD + HCT (P = 0.02). Unusual sleepiness occurred more frequently in the MD arm (P less than 0.01). Thirteen patients chose to continue on CDR, 2 on MD + HCT and 3 had no preference (P = 0.005). CDR is similar in antihypertensive effect to MD + HCT but is better tolerated with fewer withdrawals, fewer adverse effects, better compliance and has more patients electing to continue taking it.

摘要

在一项开放性交叉试验中,将Brinerdin(山德士公司生产)——一种由利尿剂(氯噻酮5毫克)、血管扩张剂(双氢麦角汀0.5毫克)和利血平(0.1毫克)组成的复方制剂(CDR)——与甲基多巴(MD)加氢氯噻嗪(HCT)进行了比较,观察其降压效果、不良反应、依从性及患者偏好。18名患者完成了试验的两个阶段,5名完成CDR阶段的患者在MD阶段时因4例出现不良反应、1例控制不佳而退出。每日服用50毫克HCT时,平均基线收缩压为163.9±16.3毫米汞柱,舒张压为105.9±6.7毫米汞柱。服用CDR时,收缩压降至140.3±15.1毫米汞柱,舒张压降至87.8±9.3毫米汞柱。服用MD+HCT时,收缩压降至138.5±16.9毫米汞柱,舒张压降至88.9±10.3毫米汞柱。两个治疗阶段收缩压的差异(1.8毫米汞柱;95%置信区间(CI)-4.1+7.7毫米汞柱)和舒张压的差异(1.1毫米汞柱;95%CI-4.6+2.4毫米汞柱)均无统计学意义,P值分别为0.6和0.7。CDR的依从性为98.2%,MD+HCT的依从性为94.7%(P=0.02)。MD组出现异常嗜睡的情况更频繁(P<0.01)。13名患者选择继续服用CDR,2名选择继续服用MD+HCT,3名无偏好(P=0.005)。CDR的降压效果与MD+HCT相似,但耐受性更好,退出人数更少,不良反应更少,依从性更好,且有更多患者选择继续服用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验