Ryan William R, Hwang Peter H
Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Nov;136(11):1099-103. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.179.
To determine the safety and tolerance of a buffered preservative-free acidified solution as an alternative to standard chemical preservatives to prevent microbial contamination of saline nasal spray.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.
Tertiary academic medical center.
Healthy volunteers with no history or signs of sinonasal disease.
Twenty volunteers used a buffered preservative-free acidified solution in a saline nasal spray and a benzalkonium chloride-containing saline nasal spray for 1 week each, separated by a 1-week washout period.
At study enrollment and after using each nasal spray solution, participants completed a visual analog scale symptom questionnaire and the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test and underwent nasal endoscopic examination, which was graded using a modified Lund-Kennedy scoring system. At the end of each test period, the contents of each nasal spray bottle were cultured for microorganism growth.
All 20 participants completed the study. Four participants who developed upper respiratory tract illnesses during the study period were excluded from secondary analyses. No differences were observed in specific sinonasal symptoms or nasal endoscopy findings after use of either nasal spray. No nasal spray solutions from either group had any microorganism growth.
In a short-term study with a small sample size, a preservative-free acidified solution seems to be safe and well tolerated, while maintaining sterility in a multiple-dose applicator without use of chemical preservatives.
确定一种缓冲的无防腐剂酸化溶液作为标准化学防腐剂的替代品,用于预防生理盐水鼻腔喷雾剂微生物污染的安全性和耐受性。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉临床试验。
三级学术医疗中心。
无鼻窦疾病病史或体征的健康志愿者。
20名志愿者分别使用含缓冲无防腐剂酸化溶液的生理盐水鼻腔喷雾剂和含苯扎氯铵的生理盐水鼻腔喷雾剂1周,中间间隔1周的洗脱期。
在研究入组时以及使用每种鼻腔喷雾溶液后,参与者完成视觉模拟量表症状问卷和20项鼻窦结局测试,并接受鼻内镜检查,使用改良的Lund-Kennedy评分系统进行评分。在每个测试期结束时,对每个鼻腔喷雾瓶的内容物进行微生物生长培养。
所有20名参与者均完成研究。在研究期间出现上呼吸道疾病的4名参与者被排除在二次分析之外。使用两种鼻腔喷雾剂后,在特定的鼻窦症状或鼻内镜检查结果方面未观察到差异。两组的鼻腔喷雾溶液均未出现任何微生物生长。
在一项小样本的短期研究中,无防腐剂酸化溶液似乎安全且耐受性良好,同时在不使用化学防腐剂的多剂量喷雾器中保持无菌状态。