Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):101-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f53523.
Care for falls and urinary incontinence (UI) among older patients is inadequate. One possible explanation is that physicians provide less recommended care to patients who are not as concerned about their falls and UI.
To test whether patient-reported severity for 2 geriatric conditions, falls, and UI, is associated with quality of care.
Prospective cohort study of elders with falls and/or fear of falling (n = 384) and UI (n = 163).
Participants in the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders-2 Study (2002-2003), which evaluated an intervention to improve the care for falls and UI among older (age, ≥ 75) ambulatory care patients with falls/fear of falling or UI.
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Incontinence Quality of Life surveys measured at baseline, quality of care measured by a 13-month medical record abstraction.
There was a small difference in falls quality scores across the range of FES, with greater patient-perceived falls severity associated with better odds of passing falls quality indicators (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.02-1.21] per 10-point increment in FES). Greater patient-perceived UI severity (Incontinence Quality of Life score) was not associated with better quality of UI care.
Although older persons with greater patient-perceived falls severity receive modestly better quality of care, those with more distressing incontinence do not. For both conditions, however, even the most symptomatic patients received less than half of recommended care. Low patient-perceived severity of condition is not the basis of poor care for falls and UI.
对老年患者跌倒和尿失禁(UI)的护理不足。一个可能的解释是,医生为对跌倒和 UI 不太关注的患者提供的护理推荐较少。
测试患者报告的 2 种老年疾病(跌倒和 UI)的严重程度与护理质量之间的关系。
对有跌倒和/或害怕跌倒(n=384)和 UI(n=163)的老年人进行前瞻性队列研究。
参与脆弱老年人评估-2 研究(2002-2003 年)的受试者,该研究评估了一项干预措施,以改善对有跌倒/害怕跌倒或 UI 的年龄在 75 岁及以上的门诊患者的跌倒和 UI 的护理。
基线时使用跌倒效能量表(FES)和尿失禁生活质量调查进行测量,通过 13 个月的医疗记录摘要来测量护理质量。
在 FES 的范围内,跌倒质量评分存在微小差异,患者感知的跌倒严重程度越高,通过跌倒质量指标的可能性就越大(OR:每增加 10 分,FES 增加 1.11[95%CI:1.02-1.21])。患者感知的 UI 严重程度(尿失禁生活质量评分)与更好的 UI 护理质量无关。
尽管患者感知的跌倒严重程度较高的老年人获得的护理质量略有改善,但症状更严重的患者并未获得更好的护理。对于这两种疾病,即使是症状最严重的患者,也只接受了不到一半的推荐护理。患者感知的疾病严重程度低并不是导致跌倒和 UI 护理不佳的原因。