Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Br J Radiol. 2011 Apr;84(1000):335-41. doi: 10.1259/bjr/57998586. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
We investigated the image quality of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
Inflated and fixed lungs were scanned with a garnet detector CT in high-resolution mode (HR mode) or non-high-resolution (HR) mode, and MPR images were then reconstructed. Observers compared 15 MPR images of ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) with those of ASIR (0%), and assessed image quality using a visual five-point scale (1, definitely inferior; 5, definitely superior), with particular emphasis on normal pulmonary structures, artefacts, noise and overall image quality.
The mean overall image quality scores in HR mode were 3.67 with ASIR (40%) and 4.97 with ASIR (80%). Those in non-HR mode were 3.27 with ASIR (40%) and 3.90 with ASIR (80%). The mean artefact scores in HR mode were 3.13 with ASIR (40%) and 3.63 with ASIR (80%), but those in non-HR mode were 2.87 with ASIR (40%) and 2.53 with ASIR (80%). The mean scores of the other parameters were greater than 3, whereas those in HR mode were higher than those in non-HR mode. There were significant differences between ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) in overall image quality (p<0.01). Contrast medium in the injection syringe was scanned to analyse image quality; ASIR did not suppress the severe artefacts of contrast medium.
In general, MPR image quality with ASIR (80%) was superior to that with ASIR (40%). However, there was an increased incidence of artefacts by ASIR when CT images were obtained in non-HR mode.
研究自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)在多平面重建(MPR)中的图像质量。
采用石榴石探测器 CT 以高分辨率模式(HR 模式)或非高分辨率(HR)模式对充气固定肺进行扫描,然后重建 MPR 图像。观察者比较了 40%和 80%ASIR 的 15 张 MPR 图像与 0%ASIR 的 MPR 图像,并使用视觉五分制(1,明显较差;5,明显较好)评估图像质量,重点关注正常肺结构、伪影、噪声和整体图像质量。
HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均整体图像质量评分为 3.67,ASIR(80%)的评分为 4.97。非 HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均评分为 3.27,ASIR(80%)的评分为 3.90。HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均伪影评分为 3.13,ASIR(80%)的评分为 3.63;而非 HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均评分为 2.87,ASIR(80%)的评分为 2.53。其他参数的平均评分均大于 3,而 HR 模式下的评分高于非 HR 模式下的评分。ASIR(40%)和 ASIR(80%)在整体图像质量方面差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。对注射器中的造影剂进行扫描以分析图像质量,结果显示 ASIR 无法抑制造影剂的严重伪影。
一般来说,ASIR(80%)的 MPR 图像质量优于 ASIR(40%)。然而,在非 HR 模式下获得 CT 图像时,ASIR 会增加伪影的发生率。