Suppr超能文献

使用自适应统计迭代重建技术的肺部 CT 扫描多平面重建的图像质量。

Image quality of multiplanar reconstruction of pulmonary CT scans using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2011 Apr;84(1000):335-41. doi: 10.1259/bjr/57998586. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the image quality of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

METHODS

Inflated and fixed lungs were scanned with a garnet detector CT in high-resolution mode (HR mode) or non-high-resolution (HR) mode, and MPR images were then reconstructed. Observers compared 15 MPR images of ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) with those of ASIR (0%), and assessed image quality using a visual five-point scale (1, definitely inferior; 5, definitely superior), with particular emphasis on normal pulmonary structures, artefacts, noise and overall image quality.

RESULTS

The mean overall image quality scores in HR mode were 3.67 with ASIR (40%) and 4.97 with ASIR (80%). Those in non-HR mode were 3.27 with ASIR (40%) and 3.90 with ASIR (80%). The mean artefact scores in HR mode were 3.13 with ASIR (40%) and 3.63 with ASIR (80%), but those in non-HR mode were 2.87 with ASIR (40%) and 2.53 with ASIR (80%). The mean scores of the other parameters were greater than 3, whereas those in HR mode were higher than those in non-HR mode. There were significant differences between ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) in overall image quality (p<0.01). Contrast medium in the injection syringe was scanned to analyse image quality; ASIR did not suppress the severe artefacts of contrast medium.

CONCLUSION

In general, MPR image quality with ASIR (80%) was superior to that with ASIR (40%). However, there was an increased incidence of artefacts by ASIR when CT images were obtained in non-HR mode.

摘要

目的

研究自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)在多平面重建(MPR)中的图像质量。

方法

采用石榴石探测器 CT 以高分辨率模式(HR 模式)或非高分辨率(HR)模式对充气固定肺进行扫描,然后重建 MPR 图像。观察者比较了 40%和 80%ASIR 的 15 张 MPR 图像与 0%ASIR 的 MPR 图像,并使用视觉五分制(1,明显较差;5,明显较好)评估图像质量,重点关注正常肺结构、伪影、噪声和整体图像质量。

结果

HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均整体图像质量评分为 3.67,ASIR(80%)的评分为 4.97。非 HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均评分为 3.27,ASIR(80%)的评分为 3.90。HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均伪影评分为 3.13,ASIR(80%)的评分为 3.63;而非 HR 模式下,ASIR(40%)的平均评分为 2.87,ASIR(80%)的评分为 2.53。其他参数的平均评分均大于 3,而 HR 模式下的评分高于非 HR 模式下的评分。ASIR(40%)和 ASIR(80%)在整体图像质量方面差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。对注射器中的造影剂进行扫描以分析图像质量,结果显示 ASIR 无法抑制造影剂的严重伪影。

结论

一般来说,ASIR(80%)的 MPR 图像质量优于 ASIR(40%)。然而,在非 HR 模式下获得 CT 图像时,ASIR 会增加伪影的发生率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Iterative reconstruction: how it works, how to apply it.迭代重建:其工作原理及应用方法。
Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Oct;44 Suppl 3:431-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3102-1. Epub 2014 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验