Suppr超能文献

医护人员对与患者报告的化疗引起的恶心和呕吐发生率的感知,在添加 NK-1 受体拮抗剂之后。

Perception of healthcare providers versus patient reported incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after the addition of NK-1 receptor antagonists.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1983-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1042-3. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Physicians and nurses often underestimate the incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after both highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). This study assesses physicians' and nurses' perceptions of CINV in their own practices after the introduction of aprepitant.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of patients receiving the first cycle of HEC regimens with CDDP and without CDDP or MEC was performed. Eligible patients completed a 6-day diary recording emetic episodes, nausea assessment, and antiemetic medication use. Physicians and nurses estimated the incidence of acute and delayed CINV after the first administration of HEC and MEC. The observed incidence rates of CINV were compared with the rates predicted by healthcare providers. Aprepitant was given to patients receiving HEC regimes with CDDP.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine physicians and nurses and 95 patients (87% receiving HEC and 14% MEC) were recruited. The global control of CINV was 66.67% for all patients and 73.33%, 47.06%, and 55.56% for patients receiving HEC regimens with CDDP, HEC regimens without CDDP and MEC, respectively. Physicians and nurses underestimated the control of acute CINV in patients receiving HEC regimens with CDDP, but they accurately predicted the control of delayed CINV. All physicians and nurses predicted the control of acute CINV after HEC regiments without CDDP and after MEC quite accurately, whereas they overestimated the control of delayed CINV after both regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprepitant allows for better control of CINV in HEC regimens with CDDP, and this control is accurately perceived by physicians and nurses. However, physicians and nurses overestimate the control of delayed CINV after HEC regimens without CDDP and after MEC. CINV is still an important target for improved therapeutic intervention and the healthcare providers must be aware of its actual incidence.

摘要

目的

医生和护士经常低估高度致吐化疗(HEC)和中度致吐化疗(MEC)后化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的发生率。本研究评估了阿瑞匹坦引入后医生和护士对其自身实践中 CINV 的看法。

方法

对接受 CDDP 联合 HEC 方案和无 CDDP 或 MEC 的首次 HEC 方案的患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。合格的患者完成了为期 6 天的日记记录呕吐发作、恶心评估和止吐药物使用情况。医生和护士估计了首次 HEC 和 MEC 后急性和迟发性 CINV 的发生率。观察到的 CINV 发生率与医疗保健提供者预测的发生率进行了比较。对接受 CDDP 联合 HEC 方案的患者给予阿瑞匹坦。

结果

共招募了 29 名医生和护士以及 95 名患者(87%接受 HEC,14%接受 MEC)。所有患者的 CINV 总体控制率为 66.67%,接受 CDDP 联合 HEC 方案、无 CDDP 的 HEC 方案和 MEC 的患者分别为 73.33%、47.06%和 55.56%。医生和护士低估了接受 CDDP 联合 HEC 方案的患者急性 CINV 的控制情况,但他们准确预测了迟发性 CINV 的控制情况。所有医生和护士都相当准确地预测了无 CDDP 的 HEC 方案和 MEC 后急性 CINV 的控制情况,但他们高估了这两种方案后迟发性 CINV 的控制情况。

结论

阿瑞匹坦可使 CDDP 联合 HEC 方案中的 CINV 得到更好的控制,医生和护士能够准确感知这种控制。然而,医生和护士高估了无 CDDP 的 HEC 方案和 MEC 后迟发性 CINV 的控制情况。CINV 仍然是改善治疗干预的重要目标,医疗保健提供者必须意识到其实际发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验