Glegg Stephanie M N, Holsti Liisa
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, T325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 2B5.
Can J Occup Ther. 2010 Oct;77(4):219-32. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.4.4.
Lack of knowledge and skills in seeking, evaluating, and applying evidence are barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP). The measurement of these constructs can inform educational initiatives aimed at reducing EBP barriers.
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a critical appraisal of the rehabilitation literature describing quantitative measures of EBP knowledge and skills.
Measures used with occupational therapists to evaluate EBP knowledge or skills were compiled from a search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBM Reviews, and PSYCINFO databases. Measures were evaluated using adapted criteria from the CanChild Outcome Measures Rating Form.
Of the 15 measures identified, three met criteria as being adequate for the measurement of EBP knowledge and skills.
Further measure development needs to address limitations of existing measures. Research to evaluate the psychometric properties of existing or novel measures of knowledge and skills related to EBP may improve their utility.
在寻找、评估和应用证据方面缺乏知识和技能是循证实践（EBP）的障碍。对这些构念的测量可为旨在减少循证实践障碍的教育举措提供信息。
本系统评价的目的是对描述循证实践知识和技能定量测量的康复文献进行批判性评价。
通过检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、EBM Reviews和PSYCINFO数据库，汇编了用于职业治疗师评估循证实践知识或技能的测量方法。使用CanChild结果测量评级表中的改编标准对测量方法进行评估。
在确定的15种测量方法中，有3种符合测量循证实践知识和技能的标准。
进一步的测量方法开发需要解决现有测量方法的局限性。评估现有或新的循证实践知识和技能测量方法心理测量特性的研究可能会提高其效用。
