Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Oncol. 2011 Feb;50(2):223-32. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.530689. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
Little research has been conducted on the effect of self-reported rating of symptom severity on quality of life (QoL) among cancer survivors. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of symptoms and whether information about self-reported symptom severity adds value to QoL measurements.
A questionnaire including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and an empirically derived symptom check-list was completed by 2 486 cancer survivors participating in a rehabilitation program at baseline and at 1, 6 and 12 months' follow-up. We used multivariate linear regression models to evaluate the association between QoL and the dichotomous variables for perceived symptom severity (high vs. low) and cancer stage (high vs. low), with adjustment for age, gender, education and time since diagnosis.
Of the 2 379 participants who reported having one or more symptoms, 1 479 (62%) considered the reported symptom to be severe. This subgroup had significantly poorer QoL at baseline for all sites, ranging from -15.9 to -10.2, compared to those who did not regard their symptom as severe. Significantly lower baseline levels on all functional subscales were seen for all sites in association with high perceived symptom severity (range from -9.9 to -3.0 (physical functioning), from -21.1 to -13.0 (social functioning), from -18.8 to -8.5 (emotional functioning), and from -18.4 to -9.6 (cognitive functioning). The impairment of physical, social, emotional, and cognitive functioning persisted through 12 months for participants with cancer of the breast, lung and those with lymphomas, although not all reached significance.
Cancer survivors, irrespective of cancer site, experience a high burden of symptoms. Thorough monitoring and assessment of symptoms and careful scrutiny of cancer survivors' perceptions of how symptoms affect their lives is critical for clinical identification of patients who might benefit from enhanced medical attention and may be an important supplement to QoL measures.
针对自我报告的症状严重程度对癌症幸存者生活质量(QoL)的影响,研究甚少。本研究旨在探讨症状的普遍性,以及自我报告的症状严重程度信息是否对 QoL 测量有增值作用。
在基线及随访 1、6、12 个月时,2486 名参加康复计划的癌症幸存者完成了包括 EORTC QLQ-C30 在内的问卷和一个经验衍生的症状检查表。我们使用多变量线性回归模型,评估 QoL 与感知症状严重程度(高 vs. 低)和癌症分期(高 vs. 低)的二分变量之间的关联,调整了年龄、性别、教育程度和诊断后时间。
在报告有一个或多个症状的 2379 名参与者中,有 1479 名(62%)认为报告的症状严重。与不认为自己症状严重的人相比,这一下组在所有部位的基线 QoL 显著较差,范围从-15.9 到-10.2。在所有部位,与高感知症状严重程度相关的所有功能子量表的基线水平显著较低(范围从-9.9 到-3.0(身体功能)、从-21.1 到-13.0(社会功能)、从-18.8 到-8.5(情绪功能)和从-18.4 到-9.6(认知功能)。对于乳腺癌、肺癌和淋巴瘤患者,身体、社会、情绪和认知功能的损伤在 12 个月时仍持续存在,尽管并非所有损伤都具有统计学意义。
无论癌症部位如何,癌症幸存者都经历着高症状负担。彻底监测和评估症状,并仔细审视癌症幸存者对症状如何影响他们生活的看法,对于临床识别可能受益于增强医疗关注的患者至关重要,这可能是 QoL 测量的重要补充。